He’s under pressure. He’s got to get a backup QB to beat a good team on the road. That’s never happened under Saban.
Yeah, I mean it's not like Nick Saban ever spotted a good team a 13-point lead and then put a backup QB in at the half to beat that team in its home state.
That never happened, right?
Did Saban also never lose his starting QB at LSU and go in at the halftime trailing, 17-7, to a team that with a win was playing for the national title - and then won with the backup?
Yes to both of those.
He’s got to figure out how to put Mac in situations he can succeed. He’s not Tua. He doesn’t process things nearly as quickly.
If you say so.
In the championship game Sark didn’t call 3 straight runs after Bo went out despite having a lead and a good running game.
Because he was in 3rd and 11, 2nd and then 3rd and 7, and 3rd and 16 without his best running back.
I don't disagree that maybe he should have tried it, but keep in mind Clemson was already assuming we were going to be one-dimensional running, which is why OJ Howard was so wide open when Bo was still in the game.
If he had ponded the ball Baka likely wins that game.
Well, maybe. But Bo played the third quarter.
In the entire second half - until the final drive - we ran 24 plays for 130 yards.
68 of those yards came on the pass play to Howard, so that means we ran 23 plays and got 62 yards.
Maybe we could have done better if Cam Robinson hadn't had a false start to put us at 1st and 15 in their red zone.
Maybe if Clemson doesn't make the tackle on our fumble recovery and we get a NOT, we win.
Maybe if the officials actually call the pick plays penalties.....
There's plenty of reasons we lost to Clemson to end 2016.
Sark's play calling isn't in the top five reasons why. It's not like he had a quarterback who could pass.