Maybe he likes to tinker with the players during the tournament because it’s very similar to the tournament that matters.I say the double bye is a net negative.
But someone made the point that it seems Nate has reduced emphasis on the SECT as it seems to have had little relevance to seeding in the NCAAT. Not sure I buy that as falling from a 3 to a 4 in this NCAAT probably guarantees an earlier exit unless the team catches fire.