The Church Thread: Chapter I Verse I

cbi1972

Hall of Fame
Nov 8, 2005
18,732
2,657
182
52
Birmingham, AL
We think we're pretty smart, but God knew what he was doing when he termed us "sheep" in the Bible. Sheep are dumb...
The idea that we could be tortured forever for behaving in the way that could have been expected by someone that knew what we was doing when he created us never quite made sense to me. God taking responsibility through his son does make sense, but if I'm going to be tortured forever for misunderstanding the message, then I guess I will be
 

Bamabuzzard

FB Moderator
Staff member
Aug 15, 2004
33,120
27,747
337
49
Where ever there's BBQ, Bourbon & Football
The idea that we could be tortured forever for behaving in the way that could have been expected by someone that knew what we was doing when he created us never quite made sense to me. God taking responsibility through his son does make sense, but if I'm going to be tortured forever for misunderstanding the message, then I guess I will be
I've had several atheist and agnostic friends and acquaintances over the years bring this up as a reason or as "evidence" for them that God doesn't exist. However, I noticed something about their lives after they used this argument as to why the existence of God doesn't make sense. When basically put in the same position as God was before he created humans, they did the same thing God did.

All of these people who used the above reasoning to not believe there was a god had kids. I asked them if they had such a problem with God knowing all He knew about humanity before He created them, yet made us anyway. Then why did they decide to go ahead and have kids, knowing all they knew about human life? They knew that once that child was born, that child would experience his/her parents dying, possibly a death via cancer, bad car accident, etc. They would be brought into a world filled with pain, violence, corruption, death, heartache, heartbreak, and ultimately their death. So, if the parents knew all of this before having children, why did they bring that child into this world? If it didn't make sense for God to do it, then why did they basically do the same thing? Why subject that child to having to watch his parents die, other loved ones die, then ultimately, them dying?

Not agreeing with how someone did something isn't the best method for determining their existence. But that's just my opinion.
 

CrimsonJazz

Hall of Fame
May 27, 2022
7,125
8,441
187
I've had several atheist and agnostic friends and acquaintances over the years bring this up as a reason or as "evidence" for them that God doesn't exist. However, I noticed something about their lives after they used this argument as to why the existence of God doesn't make sense. When basically put in the same position as God was before he created humans, they did the same thing God did.

All of these people who used the above reasoning to not believe there was a god had kids. I asked them if they had such a problem with God knowing all He knew about humanity before He created them, yet made us anyway. Then why did they decide to go ahead and have kids, knowing all they knew about human life? They knew that once that child was born, that child would experience his/her parents dying, possibly a death via cancer, bad car accident, etc. They would be brought into a world filled with pain, violence, corruption, death, heartache, heartbreak, and ultimately their death. So, if the parents knew all of this before having children, why did they bring that child into this world? If it didn't make sense for God to do it, then why did they basically do the same thing? Why subject that child to having to watch his parents die, other loved ones die, then ultimately, them dying?

Not agreeing with how someone did something isn't the best method for determining their existence. But that's just my opinion.
This is a great argument. (Clipped and saved.)
 

Its On A Slab

All-American
Apr 18, 2018
2,001
3,323
182
Pyongyang, Democratic Republic of Korea
I've had several atheist and agnostic friends and acquaintances over the years bring this up as a reason or as "evidence" for them that God doesn't exist. However, I noticed something about their lives after they used this argument as to why the existence of God doesn't make sense. When basically put in the same position as God was before he created humans, they did the same thing God did.

All of these people who used the above reasoning to not believe there was a god had kids. I asked them if they had such a problem with God knowing all He knew about humanity before He created them, yet made us anyway. Then why did they decide to go ahead and have kids, knowing all they knew about human life? They knew that once that child was born, that child would experience his/her parents dying, possibly a death via cancer, bad car accident, etc. They would be brought into a world filled with pain, violence, corruption, death, heartache, heartbreak, and ultimately their death. So, if the parents knew all of this before having children, why did they bring that child into this world? If it didn't make sense for God to do it, then why did they basically do the same thing? Why subject that child to having to watch his parents die, other loved ones die, then ultimately, them dying?

Not agreeing with how someone did something isn't the best method for determining their existence. But that's just my opinion.
I think you are missing something in the argument.

If God is all-knowing, all-seeing, perfect, why would He/She create a human race that is woefully imperfect, prone to making bad decisions, prone to dying/infirmity in the most terrible ways(cancer, birth defects, accidents, wasting diseases etc). And in the end, condemning that imperfect soul for all eternity for failing to live up to His/Her standards?

Or is the O/T "Jealous God"? Believe in Me or else?

(Just playing Devil's Advocate here. As a confirmed skeptic, I don't really have a solid opinion among many doubts. :D ).
 

mdb-tpet

All-SEC
Sep 2, 2004
1,941
2,045
282
I've struggled with the idea that God is a He, since only women can give birth to humans. If God can create human life all by himself, then he's actually an asexual being OR the real original mother of humans was written out of history...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Its On A Slab

Bamabuzzard

FB Moderator
Staff member
Aug 15, 2004
33,120
27,747
337
49
Where ever there's BBQ, Bourbon & Football
I think you are missing something in the argument.

If God is all-knowing, all-seeing, perfect, why would He/She create a human race that is woefully imperfect, prone to making bad decisions, prone to dying/infirmity in the most terrible ways(cancer, birth defects, accidents, wasting diseases etc).
I don't think God created nature or Adam and Eve imperfect. They were perfect within the natural realm they were created. They were perfect in their original state. God gave them free will, the capacity to make decisions independently of Him. When you give someone free will, you also give them the capacity to make decisions both good and bad, right and wrong. It's not true free will if there isn't a capacity to make all types of decisions. They were given complete control of their decisions, which in and of itself is a gift, they just decided to use their gift the wrong way and it fractured their nature to it core along with the natural creation around them.


And in the end, condemning that imperfect soul for all eternity for failing to live up to His/Her standards?
Actually, God doesn't condemn anyone's soul for not living up to His standard. They are condemned for not accepting God's gift, Jesus Christ. Once sin entered human nature, it was impossible to live up to God's standard, it wasn't impossible before the fall. But after the fall, not one person ever born could live up to God's commandments because their nature wouldn't allow it. But all aspects of God's nature is perfect; not one characteristic of God is imperfect. Just as His grace and mercy are perfect, so is his justice. Perfect justice doesn't allow wrongdoing to go unpunished. If God were to allow even one sin to go unpunished, His justice wouldn't be perfect. Jesus satisfied God's justice and paid for humanity's sins through His death and resurrection. At that point, humanity had access back to God and the ability to return to their creator in an eternal, perfect state. When people reject God's free sacrificial gift to not have their sins held against them, they are choosing to have their soul condemned, not God.

Or is the O/T "Jealous God"? Believe in Me or else?
I love it when this verse is referenced by unbelievers because most have no idea that all jealousy isn't a bad thing nor is all jealousy a sin. Somewhere down the line of humanity, some relationship/psychologist whack deemed all jealousy as bad. The Bible talks about two types of jealousy, one that is rooted in the sinful nature and the other that is righteous jealousy. Most nonbelievers do not realize this and automatically think the Bible contradicts itself, but it doesn't. If my spouse never got jealous of me, under any circumstances and didn't care one "iota" if other women flirted with me or I flirted with other women. I'd better start worrying. It would mean more than likely she no longer has intimate feelings for me anymore. But if I'm jealous because my neighbor is more successful than I am, has nicer things than I do, etc. Then that jealousy is rooted out of the sinful nature of envy and covetousness. Two completely different types of jealousy.[/QUOTE]

(Just playing Devil's Advocate here. As a confirmed skeptic, I don't really have a solid opinion among many doubts. :D ).
Oh I know, but I like to answer the questions anyway. (y)
 

Bamabuzzard

FB Moderator
Staff member
Aug 15, 2004
33,120
27,747
337
49
Where ever there's BBQ, Bourbon & Football
I've struggled with the idea that God is a He, since only women can give birth to humans. If God can create human life all by himself, then he's actually an asexual being OR the real original mother of humans was written out of history...
You're looking at it as if God is trapped within the creation (time, matter, and space). He sits outside of creation and isn't subject to the laws of nature (time, matter, and space). The Bible says God is a spirit. It's been debated that at times the original language (in the old testament) uses a greek word that doesn't assert male or female to refer to God. But, as you read the Bible it is obvious that God (as it pertains to humans) wants to be referred to as male within the relationship of Him and humans. Whether that means God actually is a male spirit or not, I guess, can be debated. Granted, you've got people who will debate this, so if you're interested, there is a lot of material on the web about it.
 

New Posts

Latest threads