I haven't seen one of these since Danny Devito sailing in the sewer in a rubber swan.:eek2: Maybe I'll make an exception for this one.
The problem is, the very few critics who are giving it negative reviews can't justify what makes it a bad film. They're just claiming it's too long and too dark. Silence of the Lambs was dark, but was it a bad film? Titanic was long, but was it a bad film (even though I hated it lol)? They can't give a valid reason as to why this film is bad. I've read four negative reviews, and each of those critics were obviously not professionals, nor did they give valid reasons as to why it was bad. They weren't convincing, nor were they on target with anything they said. They claimed this film is too dark for children, yet they don't state why, such the darkness of the film is cheesy, cliche, pointless, etc. etc. It's just too dark and too long. That's it. So, can their word be trusted compared to the critics who are praising it can? They seem to be on target stating why the film is outstanding, rather than just plainly stating it's a good movie. You know what I mean?I think some of you posters are being a little too critical of the critics (heh). Let's not forget that this movie hasn't even come out yet. If you caught an advance screening, then disregard what I said, but there is still a chance this movie won't be good. Sure, it's a small chance. I fully expect that I will immediately place it towards the top of action/comic book movies I have seen. However, I've been burned on this kind of hype before. It's not out of the question that the movie isn't good, much less the be all end all of film making.
So, go see it. Then skewer the critics that didn't like it.
Actually too dark and too long are both valid criticisms for a movie. Especially for a big-budget summer action movie. I've also heard some negative reviews call the movie jumbled and that it has poor pacing. Whatever.The problem is, the very few critics who are giving it negative reviews can't justify what makes it a bad film. They're just claiming it's too long and too dark. Silence of the Lambs was dark, but was it a bad film? Titanic was long, but was it a bad film (even though I hated it lol)? They can't give a valid reason as to why this film is bad. I've read four negative reviews, and each of those critics were obviously not professionals, nor did they give valid reasons as to why it was bad. They weren't convincing, nor were they on target with anything they said. They claimed this film is too dark for children, yet they don't state why, such the darkness of the film is cheesy, cliche, pointless, etc. etc. It's just too dark and too long. That's it. So, can their word be trusted compared to the critics who are praising it can? They seem to be on target stating why the film is outstanding, rather than just plainly stating it's a good movie. You know what I mean?
HA! I hadn't seen that review. Okay, I'll give you that one. Anytime a movie "critic" opens up with:http://www.news.com.au/entertainment/story/0,26278,24029281-7485,00.html
The above link will lead you guys to a review that's somewhat of the point I'm trying to make about illegitimate critics.
Pretty much a death sentence for their credibility when it comes to reviewing movies.I've never seen Spiderman, Batman, Ironman, X-Men or any other movie featuring any sort of men or man in an action.
My cinematic comfort zone is limited to Pixar movies, comedies and romantic comedies. I am no fun to go to the video store with.
Agreed on all fronts, but as for The Joker and his "rising"... I kind of like that we didn't get an origin story or anything like that because, honestly, with The Joker... you never know what his true origin is. All we know is that he probably escaped Arkham at the end of Batman Begins and has been on a crime spree ever since. The mystery behind him makes the character that much more dynamic in the sense of him being just a force of evil.Simple Suggestion: SEE IT IN IMAX!!!
The movie is mindblowing and intense. You literally have to recover immediately after seeing this movie.
One downside, I wasn't disappointed in Ledger's performance, role, or portrayal, however, I felt they could've been a little more distinct with his "rising".
He made subsequent appearances throughout the movie (until the end), but each time he was shown, he stole the spotlight and had you guessing the entire time.
One thing I loved was the fact that it wasn't predictable, nor were there any noticeable cliches. Each time you thought you knew what would happen next, it would be the complete opposite.
Other than that, it's still a rollercoaster of a movie that I strongly suggest you all see... and goodness WAS THE SCORE NOT GROUNDBREAKING?
PS: It's no where near as dark as you think. A lot more violence, but nothing major. In addition to that, the action sequences were breathtaking and MUCH more enjoyable than those in the first.
I had heard about the pencil from some of the reviews, but I had no idea how freaking awesome it would look on the screen. What made Ledger's performance work for me was all the little nuances he threw in to show how freaking insane he really was - specifically the flicking of the tongue as if he was a lizard of some sort.Just got in and all i can say is "Wow."
That was the fastest three hours of my life - the film really does zoom by and never lags.
Heath Ledger is not in this film, he completely and totally disappears into the Joker. Once you see this performance you will hopefully feel the way that I do - that we lost a truly amazing talent way too soon.
Saw it in IMAX-dome which was approaching damn near sensory overload...it was incredible.
The film was amazing but the story is, and should be, Heath Ledger's performance. His pencil trick alone was worth the price of admission. Hannibal Lecter now has company and the praise isnt undue...Ledger deserves at least a nomination and should come away with the Oscar - he was THAT good.
Agreed on all fronts, but as for The Joker and his "rising"... I kind of like that we didn't get an origin story or anything like that because, honestly, with The Joker... you never know what his true origin is. All we know is that he probably escaped Arkham at the end of Batman Begins and has been on a crime spree ever since. The mystery behind him makes the character that much more dynamic in the sense of him being just a force of evil.