Not only that, but the NIT is no way to measure the success of a program. You want to know where you measure up to the perennial basketball powerhouses? You have to play against them to find out. Even if you get knocked out in the first round, at least you know where you stand.Making the NIT is no guarantee of winning the NIT. oNE AND OUT in the NIT would be hard to swallow. I don't think there would be much fan interest and the players would be disappointed.
people actually voted NCAA. wow.People actually voted for winning the NIT. Wow.
Yes. We lost in championship game in '01, not '91If, you mean Bama, then the year is off. Bama made to 2nd or 3rd round in NCAA tourny in '91. Bama went NCAA the next season. Played in NIT in '93, '96 & '00, & maybe another year recently.
i highly doubt Clemson would clobber us. With the possible rest, we could have competed with plenty of top teams in the country.In most years I'd go with the NCAA. But I've got to go with the NIT this year. If you look at our team's performance in clutch games (Vandy, Florida, Georgia, 2 SEC Tourney) we're 2-3. I think we need to mature (not to mention getting a real outside shooter) and the NIT gives us the best chance of doing that in my opinion. Stepping in and getting clobbered in a play-in game vs Clemson would have been worse in my opinion for a young team that really looks to come back almost intact next year.
*snicker* We are dead-legged at this late point in the season. So where is this 'rest'? You realize that this year we would have likely been in a play-in game if we had made the field of 68? So, no rest there. And which top teams? Kentucky? They're not a top team and they killed us in the Championship game.....it's been a long season. We are where we should be. It's okay.i highly doubt Clemson would clobber us. With the possible rest, we could have competed with plenty of top teams in the country.