Count again.I am a little upset the Hugh Nall allowed this to happen for the 2nd time in the same season.
Count again.I am a little upset the Hugh Nall allowed this to happen for the 2nd time in the same season.
I thought the same thing....the apologists can't explain that away.The thing that baffles me is:
even if he doesn't go low, that's still an illegal block in the back. How could he have thought it was a good idea to block him?
If the refs ejected a player or two, the word would get out, and it would stop.I had the misfortune of watching the game last night at a party which was almost all barn fans and they were joking and bragging about knocking, possibly ending the careers, two high profile players out of games. They thought it was great.:conf2: I know all schools use this bocking technique but they don't do it to intentionally hurt other players. The barn is the only one I have seen this year get called for it.
And what, pray tell, does Chris Samuels have to do with the barn's reputation for dirty play on the OL? If Chris Samuels develops a reputation for dirty play I assure you we will call him out here. Have Wingnut, Pugh, or Ramsey called with any apologies for their "accidents"? Way too much willingness to attach a Bama reference to these events. Mutually exclusive.So does this make Samuels an evil, dirty player? Or could his just be an accident? Way too much willingness to attach malice to these events.....
Get this and many more items at our TideFans.shop!
Purchases may result in a commission being paid to TideFans.