If you go way back to the beginning of the modern era of college football, I believe it is pretty much accepted that would be 1950 forward it is easy to understand why the Big 12 did not work.
Oklahoma ruled the Big 8 exclusively until Nebraska found its program in the mid 60's. From roughly 1965-1995 OU and NU traded punches as to who was the dominant program. It was always a classic confrontation and quite frankly it way overshadowed the Red River Rivalry. The other 6 teams, Kansas, KSU, Iowa State, Colorado, Missouri, and OSU offered token resistence.
Texas dominated the old SWC from 1950 until its demise with Arkansas its only real challenger and that wasn't often. Let's see why Texas dominated the SWC: TAMU, Rice, Baylor, SMU, TCU, Houston, TTU. You have to remember that during that time period none of those programs were competitive, including TCU. TAMU had a couple of good years but for the most part it was always Texas on top.
In 1996 the two conferences merge, Texas and OU are put in the same division which waters down the Big 12 North. Alternating play and not being in the same division, the NU vs OU rivalry fades and is replaced with the Red River Rivalry (Shootout). Enter Mack Brown and Bob Stoops and post Tom Osborne Nebraska sinks further into the bowels of college football.
Yes, money is a factor, but it is also about loss of pride, recognition, and control which Texas had in the SWC and usurped from both OU and NU when the Big 8 merged with the SWC. I think it would be a big mistake for the SEC to offer an invitation to Texas. End of history lesson.
Oklahoma ruled the Big 8 exclusively until Nebraska found its program in the mid 60's. From roughly 1965-1995 OU and NU traded punches as to who was the dominant program. It was always a classic confrontation and quite frankly it way overshadowed the Red River Rivalry. The other 6 teams, Kansas, KSU, Iowa State, Colorado, Missouri, and OSU offered token resistence.
Texas dominated the old SWC from 1950 until its demise with Arkansas its only real challenger and that wasn't often. Let's see why Texas dominated the SWC: TAMU, Rice, Baylor, SMU, TCU, Houston, TTU. You have to remember that during that time period none of those programs were competitive, including TCU. TAMU had a couple of good years but for the most part it was always Texas on top.
In 1996 the two conferences merge, Texas and OU are put in the same division which waters down the Big 12 North. Alternating play and not being in the same division, the NU vs OU rivalry fades and is replaced with the Red River Rivalry (Shootout). Enter Mack Brown and Bob Stoops and post Tom Osborne Nebraska sinks further into the bowels of college football.
Yes, money is a factor, but it is also about loss of pride, recognition, and control which Texas had in the SWC and usurped from both OU and NU when the Big 8 merged with the SWC. I think it would be a big mistake for the SEC to offer an invitation to Texas. End of history lesson.