92, you've always got a thoughtful take on topics. I appreciate that.it hasn't been in a long time, if ever. look at all of the labor issues around the turn of the century (20th) and after. but yes, the corporate model is somewhat a reflection of American values, it has always been.
In an absolute sense, your quote is correct. I do believe that a sense of loyalty (both directions) was valued more in a society which was less geographically fluid, though, even if it was for practical rather than moral or ethical reasons. The increasing ability and tendency of the populous to more readily relocate for a better job and the corresponding trend of businesses to do the same for a different labor force has changed our dynamic greatly. The concept of a two week notice is much less firm than when I entered the work force, for example, and the number of companies with a retirement plan has greatly shrunk. There are other indicators, some objective and some subjective, but the old paradigm of working one or two jobs in one lifetime is - for better or worse - disappearing from our landscape. This is what makes seniority vs. ability such a pertinent topic - it's a discussion of the changing world in which we live and the consequences of those changes.
I believe that both seniority and ability should both matter, BTW, and don't care for models that ignore either. That is a far cry from claiming I know the best balance, however, and I am keenly interested in this thread.
Carry on.