And he's yet to do anything :wink:.Some of the same things were said about Jerrell Harris. He's now 6-3 235.
And he's yet to do anything :wink:.Some of the same things were said about Jerrell Harris. He's now 6-3 235.
That's not so...he had a great game against Ga State last year!And he's yet to do anything :wink:.
recent pics of JH would seem to indicate that he is bigger than 235 lbs. my untrained naked eyes would say he is near the 245-250 lbs range.Some of the same things were said about Jerrell Harris. He's now 6-3 235.
Plus, these kids have another year to grow before they are ready for college football. A 210-215 pounder just entering his HS senior year is a pretty good sized LB.recent pics of JH would seem to indicate that he is bigger than 235 lbs. my untrained naked eyes would say he is near the 245-250 lbs range.
Thanks for the update, Fishhead. I haven't followed his recruitment much at all, but I'm surprised LSU isn't really in it if they're interested.According to Tiger Bait, he's tired of waiting. Not linking due to pay site...
FWIW, it ain't gonna be LSU. I would be shocked if I'm wrong about that one...
Never had auto-correct change either "Alabama" or "LSU" to "we're," so that is no typo. Exactly how reciprocal 'Bama is about that whole "we" business might be another story, though.Denzel Devall, when asked about a rematch, said "we're" going to win the game this time, referring to alabama. could have been a simple slip in the wordage of a text message and mean absolutely nothing, who knows.
http://alabama.247sports.com/Article/Recruits-UA-Deserves-Title-Shot-51676
I caught that as well.Never had auto-correct change either "Alabama" or "LSU" to "we're," so that is no typo. Exactly how reciprocal 'Bama is about that whole "we" business might be another story, though.
I tend to think that is right, too, but with space as limited as it is right now there are very, very few players out there that I would definitively say we would take. I think we would probably take Devall, but admittedly I do think he is at least possibly somewhat on the fence in that regard.BET from what I understand we would take Devall. FWIW.
Sent from my Droid using Tapatalk
Do you think that has anything to do with Jordan Jenkins, or would we take both? could we take both?I tend to think that is right, too, but with space as limited as it is right now there are very, very few players out there that I would definitively say we would take. I think we would probably take Devall, but admittedly I do think he is at least possibly somewhat on the fence in that regard.
Definitely will take jenkins.Do you think that has anything to do with Jordan Jenkins, or would we take both? could we take both?
Agree on Jenkins. #1 player in GA and his offer is unconditional so I don't know about Devall (I agree he is higher on board than Kwon).Definitely will take jenkins.
I have no doubt we'd take Jenkins, but would we take them both, especially with Ryan anderson already in this class? or would Devall be a back up to Jenkins, since general consensus is we lead with Jenkins.Definitely will take jenkins.