article claim Sarah Palin hooked up with bballer Glen Rice..Tea Party jumps off cliff

HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA...

From CBS's Seth Davis: This Sarah Palin story from the 2008 campaign makes a lot more sense now


HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHA :biggrin::biggrin::biggrin::biggrin::biggrin::biggrin::biggrin:
 
Ugh! That accent of hers kills me every time. :rolleyes:

If I were a guy, she'd have to agree to not talk.

sexy%2Bball%2Bgag.jpg
 
Yeah, she can be annoying at times but most guys have plenty of practice putting up with stuff like that for awhile, if you know what I mean.

Youthful lovin' has a lot of tolerance built in. At some point one becomes more curmudgeon-like.

I'm just sayin.'
 
It seems to me that much too much is being made of this. She was young, single, and I think a college sportscaster. She got drawn to a bball player and they hooked up. It has everything to do with youth, libido, and sexual inhibitions and absolutely nothing to do with race. While interracial couples permeate our society today, that wasn't always so. So if it happened years ago, why is it just now becoming an issue? I'll tell you why. It's because it's not racially relevant until someone else, who for the most part has had nothing to do with that particular situation, decides it is their place and their 'duty' to make it so.
IMO 'racism' in this country would be a non-factor if it weren't for fear and race mongering individuals whose reputations and careers depend on them keeping it alive.
 
Last edited:
It seems to me that much too much is being made of this. She was young, single, and I think a college sportscaster. She got drawn to a bball player and they hooked up. It has everything to do with youth, libido, and sexual inhibitions and absolutely nothing to do with race. While interracial couples permeate our society today, that wasn't always so. So if it happened years ago, why is it just now becoming an issue? I'll tell you why. It's because it's not racially relevant until someone else, who for the most part has had nothing to do with that particular situation, decides it is their place and their 'duty' to make it so.
IMO 'racism' in this country would be a non-factor if it weren't for fear and race mongering individuals whose reputations and careers depend on them keeping it alive.

Why shouldn't youthful indiscretions be made light of decades after they occured?

See the Robert Byrd fetish many on this board keep going.
 
Advertisement

Trending content

Advertisement

Latest threads