Re: Manziel Expected "To be the starting quarterback against Rice"
Sues them for what?Can you say Manziel Toyota...after he sues them?
Sues them for what?Can you say Manziel Toyota...after he sues them?
@billyliucci
Still awaiting final resolution (confirmation from A&M or NCAA) but assuming suspension would involve secondary violation of by-law 12.5.2.2
Ruling would make it pretty convenient and clear-cut if any of other CFB stars with a lot of memorabilia out there are scrutinized
As most predicted, all indications are that Manziel was not found guilty of accepting payment for signature. Obviously a significant note
Yep. From Brett McMurphy of ESPN:Friend in Houston called and advised per Houston media (TV&Radio) : JM was declared ineligible, applied for re-instatement and was re-instated with a 1/2 game suspension. NCAA has closed the investigation stating no money changed hands. Violation is secondary in nature. Key is supposedly NCAA has told aTm the investigation is over.
Why doesn't the ncaa threaten to kick institutions out when they lawyer up? This whole deal is because they get lawyers who demand" proof" or they will sue. Couldn't the ncaa just counter with, " accept our terms or get out? "
Opinions, thoughts?
Why doesn't the ncaa threaten to kick institutions out when they lawyer up? This whole deal is because they get lawyers who demand" proof" or they will sue. Couldn't the ncaa just counter with, " accept our terms or get out? "
Opinions, thoughts?
that'll teach him
What world does the NCAA live in where a person spends hours out of their busy schedule to sign hundreds of items, knowing the signature will significantly add to the value of these items destined for commercial sale, and does it all out of the kindness of his heart (or maybe because he likes the broker that he met just that much to do such a charitable act)?
I'm not sure what I'm missing as to why the NCAA can't look at these circumstances and begin from an assumption that a payment took place - in accordance with the normal order of things. I know it's not typically kosher to require someone to prove a negative, but here I think it's within their power to do and warranted, especially considering the NCAA's absence of subpoena power.