LGBTQ Issues: Will We Choose Love and Acceptance or Hate and Oppression? (Part 2)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Huckleberry

Hall of Fame
Nov 9, 2004
5,482
12,273
287
Jacksonville, FL
I don’t see how it’s that complicated. If you monetize your “creative expression “ and function as a business, you should follow all laws against discrimination that businesses follow. Free speech is irrelevant.
Example: you come into my business and exercise your right to free speech and I find it disruptive to business, you’ll be escorted out by the cops or me at gunpoint, even though, on a street corner, you can shout those profanities till your hearts content (unless the cops determine you’re a public nuisance). You can’t do it in my store.
Principal is the same: free speech has, by necessity, limitations when it comes to business. That these jackasses ignore that is a mockery of the whole judicial system.
The free speech issue is secondary to these judges and those who agree with their decision. This is about legitimizing bigotry, intolerance, and hatred in the name of religious freedom.
 

AWRTR

All-American
Oct 18, 2022
2,935
4,337
187
Being gay is not a sin.
Neither is being lesbian, bisexual, or transgender.
The Bible never claims that it is.
It really doesn't.
Christians should stop saying it because it's reckless and irresponsible—and it's killing people.


Link to column
As someone that has studied both Greek and Hebrew on a masters degree level that was one of the worst written pieces on what the Bible says I have ever read. The exegesis in that article wouldn’t get a passing grade in a kindergarten Sunday school class. I wonder if the original copy was written in crayon?
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: BamaHoHo and 92tide

92tide

TideFans Legend
May 9, 2000
61,207
52,937
287
55
East Point, Ga, USA
  • Like
Reactions: Jon and Go Bama

92tide

TideFans Legend
May 9, 2000
61,207
52,937
287
55
East Point, Ga, USA
a link from that piece. i have no idea if this gentleman’s study of hebrew and greek are up to snuff, so tifwiw

 

Huckleberry

Hall of Fame
Nov 9, 2004
5,482
12,273
287
Jacksonville, FL
As someone that has studied both Greek and Hebrew on a masters degree level that was one of the worst written pieces on what the Bible says I have ever read. The exegesis in that article wouldn’t get a passing grade in a kindergarten Sunday school class. I wonder if the original copy was written in crayon?
Maybe so, but rather than simply accept your take on the author, I’d be interested in your thoughts on and refutation of his positions.
 

AWRTR

All-American
Oct 18, 2022
2,935
4,337
187
a link from that piece. i have no idea if this gentleman’s study of hebrew and greek are up to snuff, so tifwiw

Once again hot garbage. He has to twist himself in knots to get to the point he wants to arrive at.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 92tide

AWRTR

All-American
Oct 18, 2022
2,935
4,337
187
Here I was thinking NYBF was the only person alive who could properly translate ancient languages and tell everyone else how wrong they are.
Always go with the simplest plainest reading when you can. Some prophecy has to almost be decided. Those passages plainly say something in the original language. The other thing to always look out for is when someone comes up with a new way to read something that has been agreed on for 2,000 years. This is all progressive Christian rereading of the text that lines up with pretty much nothing over the last 2,000 years.
 

Huckleberry

Hall of Fame
Nov 9, 2004
5,482
12,273
287
Jacksonville, FL
Always go with the simplest plainest reading when you can. Some prophecy has to almost be decided. Those passages plainly say something in the original language. The other thing to always look out for is when someone comes up with a new way to read something that has been agreed on for 2,000 years. This is all progressive Christian rereading of the text that lines up with pretty much nothing over the last 2,000 years.
It's a good thing no one listened to that rabble-rouser Martin Luther when he advocated a few changes after only 1,500 years.
 

AWRTR

All-American
Oct 18, 2022
2,935
4,337
187
It's a good thing no one listened to that rabble-rouser Martin Luther when he advocated a few changes after only 1,500 years.
Luther was parting ways with the Catholic Church or trying to reform it if he could The Catholic Church puts church tradition, Scripture, and the teachings of the pope on similar and in some cases equal levels. Luther wanted to go back Scripture alone. He was trying to root the church in Scripture and it’s plain intended meaning and not allowing the addition of things like indulgences which have no basis in the Bible like your article.
 

RollTide_HTTR

Hall of Fame
Feb 22, 2017
9,944
8,690
187
Serious question because I stopped giving the Bible much thought when I left the church but does it ever say in the Bible that the Bible itself is infallible? Because wasn't it formed by a council at some point.

And why would anyone assume a book written by humans would be infallible?

Aren't there also differences within the gospels themselves?
 
  • Like
Reactions: NationalTitles18
Status
Not open for further replies.

Fubo TV Free Trial - Cut the cord!

Purchases may result in a commission being paid to TideFans.

Latest threads