Teddy Valentine and Doug Shows in BB...
Pat Adams says "hey, what about me?"
Teddy Valentine and Doug Shows in BB...
There’s a few articles out there on him and his crew’s past exploits, which further shows there’s a problem with them being fit for the job. I’m extremely surprised the conference hasn’t done something about this with the amount of problems one crew can cause.If people know a ref/ump/official's name, that's not good. Angel Hernandez is a perfect example.
The problem is one week taking a weaker schedule into account and the next week changing the criteria. Protecting the importance of conference championship games is each conference and the tv networks’ problem, not the playoff committee. Sometime between last weekend and last night someone decided that a conference championship game winner would carry more weight with the committee and a loss didn’t count against the loser.I've got no problem with AQs. The problem is the guaranteed top seeding.
if they had said the outcome did not matter, no one would have watchedThe problem is one week taking a weaker schedule into account and the next week changing the criteria. Protecting the importance of conference championship games is each conference and the tv networks’ problem, not the playoff committee. Sometime between last weekend and last night someone decided that a conference championship game winner would carry more weight with the committee and a loss didn’t count against the loser.
The ticket buying fans left the equation long ago. A bone was thrown by scheduling one better OOC game yearly. The money comes from the TV contracts. What’s the point of scheduling tougher games and risking the loss unless absolutely every other team has to do it and when you win that game you are properly rewarded (Strength of Schedule).Where do the ticket buying fans play into this equation?
Shouldn't there be some type of obligation to them?
Already too many fluff games on the schedule, in my opinion.
I'm for going the opposite direction and adding one more conference game.
We need to be in conversations with B1G to just succeed and be done with this nonsense.Ole Miss and South Carolina got screwed as well.
Make no mistake, Sankey is feeling the heat. This is a monster HE created.
I'd have no issues with this at all...........time to get it doneWe need to be in conversations with B1G to just succeed and be done with this nonsense.
I’d be fine dropping AU permanently.I would like to see Alabama have this future SEC schedule every year
Miss State
Arkie
tennessee in Tuscaloosa only
barn in Tuscaloosa only
Mizzu
@ lsu at night
Kentucky
I don't think the dates are set just yet so theoretically they could still changeI think it’s set. We will reverse and play road games vs the teams we hosted this season, and vice versa. The reset will come in 2026. Not sure what the plan is.
I’ve been of the opinion of playing 9 or even 10 conference games. But the schedules must be balanced. And that was with the caveat that SOS would mean something to the playoff committee.
Yeah there is no need to panic wrt to scheduling.No, the AQs are what cost the SEC.
Pretty sure that whatever "logic" allowed the committee to decide that SMU was better than us would have applied to Ole Miss and USCe as well. The committee wanted to spread the wealth around, and that goal shaped their decisions.No, that cost Alabama. What about USCe and Ole Miss? It cost the SEC.
We say that but we could realistically have a SMU, Tennessee, Notre Dame, Clemson semi final with how some of these teams prepare and then you are going to hear the same thing you heard in 14 and 22 in that the committee got it right.Pretty sure that whatever "logic" allowed the committee to decide that SMU was better than us would have applied to Ole Miss and USCe as well. The committee wanted to spread the wealth around, and that goal shaped their decisions.
It'll be interesting to see the ratings, because the inaugural playoff is gonna have a lot of bad games.
You missed my point. That's okay. It is late. On to the future.Pretty sure that whatever "logic" allowed the committee to decide that SMU was better than us would have applied to Ole Miss and USCe as well. The committee wanted to spread the wealth around, and that goal shaped their decisions.
It'll be interesting to see the ratings, because the inaugural playoff is gonna have a lot of bad games.
to be fair there were a lot of bad playoff games when there were just 4 teamsPretty sure that whatever "logic" allowed the committee to decide that SMU was better than us would have applied to Ole Miss and USCe as well. The committee wanted to spread the wealth around, and that goal shaped their decisions.
It'll be interesting to see the ratings, because the inaugural playoff is gonna have a lot of bad games.
And even when there were just two.to be fair there were a lot of bad playoff games when there were just 4 teams
And considering the media rights for both conferences (SEC and ACC) are held by ESPN, it would just come down to cash.Contracts are written to be broken. Someone will just need to sit down and do the math on buyouts + billable hours on lawyers vs media rights from ABC/ESPN. I mean you don't have to look any further than how SMU slid into the ACC by foregoing TV money.
All i know is I am going to laugh very loud if Tejas, UGA and SMU all go out first round........and it could happenWe say that but we could realistically have a SMU, Tennessee, Notre Dame, Clemson semi final with how some of these teams prepare and then you are going to hear the same thing you heard in 14 and 22 in that the committee got it right.