Well we might as well limit difficult games if they don't mean anything in the grand scheme of things. Why even play football for that matter? Let's hand out some playoff trophies to 12 of the highest bidders.
We should just let an algorithm take care of it honestly, then there's not much people can argue with. Schedule difficult teams and the system will reward you.Do away with automatic qualifiers & committee. Go back to BCS formula.
I wonder how other teams did when a team had a bye week before playing. We had a bye week before uga and lsu. but so did they. Those don't count.Should be reviewed for how bye weeks are structured. Bama played at least 3 SEC teams coming off of byes and lost to 2 of them.
I haven't followed college basketball enough to know much.....but I know RPI is used. That needs to be added since we're going to continue to expand these playoffs.Would also like to see auto qualifiers go away. Not enough spots in this playoff format for it to work correctly. We'd need more teams.
Please learn something from NCAAB on the matter.
And if I'm the Clemson AD....I ask the question....Why was SMU given the 11th seed and Clemson given the 12th seed....when we just beat them?Honestly, Clemson should be furious. They played a tough OOC schedule by playing Georgia and South Carolina. And they got punished for it. If they had played lesser teams the would have a bye right now.
That would make too much sense.And if I'm the Clemson AD....I ask the question....Why was SMU given the 11th seed and Clemson given the 12th seed....when we just beat them?
Yes, the final rankings have SMU 10th and Clemson 16th, but shouldn't Clemson have earned a spot above SMU?
There's just too much subjectivity in the pot the way they've created this committee.The playoff is no longer about selecting the best teams, but which teams check off the most boxes, or which teams "deserve" to be in. Wins, regardless of strength of schedule, have proven to be the main criterion for participation in the made for TV post season. Do this, do that, and you are in. Just make it to your conference championship game, or have a gimme like the gold helmet bunch and you are in. Due to the potential loss of money for not being selected to the playoff, most schools will now opt to play cupcakes instead of a competitive school in a rival conference.
This has nothing to do with Alabama not being selected. We didn't earn it. We lost to Vanderbilt!
RPI would be great. Another metric that can be evaluated outside of JUST the committee's opinion. It seems like that is all that is really considered. It's weird to me that the selection committee for one NCAA sport can get it right, albeit with 64 teams, but the other more popular sport cannot. I don't get that.I haven't followed college basketball enough to know much.....but I know RPI is used. That needs to be added since we're going to continue to expand these playoffs.
Don't think it will be....because of this forced inclusion of lesser conferences.....but RPI would be a great addition.
We will see a lot of promote, promote, promote by ESPN to convince enough people to watch the games involving these teams in order to cover their cost of broadcasting!Boise State and Arizona State with a first round bye. Arizona State with losses to Cincinnati and Texas Tech.
Won't work with me.We will see a lot of promote, promote, promote by ESPN to convince enough people to watch the games involving these teams in order to cover their cost of broadcasting!
I'd like to see how many people actually tune in to watch SMU at Penn State.....and Indiana at Notre Dame. Fans of those schools and maybe the state of Indiana? And the Indiana/Notre Dame game is the only one on Friday night on the 20th. The other 3 are all the next day. Not to mention....SMU/Penn State and Clemson/Texas are both on TNT/Max.....hahahahaha.We will see a lot of promote, promote, promote by ESPN to convince enough people to watch the games involving these teams in order to cover their cost of broadcasting!
Don't forget about their dominant performance against Mississippi State 30-23.Boise State and Arizona State with a first round bye. Arizona State with losses to Cincinnati and Texas Tech.
And the thing about that game was Mississippi State was down big early and almost came all the way backDon't forget about their dominant performance against Mississippi State 30-23.
It is hard to take that seriously. I really don't care who wins this thing, but I will be very surprised if their ratings are good. I know some people will watch no matter what, which is how I used to be, but I wouldn't think most people would give a rip about some of these match-ups.Boise State and Arizona State with a first round bye. Arizona State with losses to Cincinnati and Texas Tech.