New healthcare thread (part II)

You've probably already seen it, but a long time ago in my Men's Health issue that month, they had a recipe using Portobello mushrooms as a steak substitute.

Similar to this one:


Grilled portebellos are fantastic!

Unfortunately my wife has an insane hatred of everything from the fungal kingdom, from this to mildew in the shower...
 
  • Like
Reactions: UAH and Bazza
I'm close to reaching the point of "just die then" after six years of this crap.

Note: blood donor centers DO NOT ask the vaccination status of people nice enough to donate blood. They DO have a questionnaire asking questions, including if you've had a certain vaccination in the last several hours or days.

But a group of mental midgets with room temperature IQs and (mostly) Republican primary voting records are really showing their idiocy at this point.

 
Grilled portebellos are fantastic!

Unfortunately my wife has an insane hatred of everything from the fungal kingdom, from this to mildew in the shower...

One of my secret Chicken/Turkey-Veggie soup weapons is dumping in a can of sliced or pieces of mushrooms.

In years past while grilling I've placed some whole ones on the grill during the process - and just popped them in my mouth while waiting for everything else to finish.

I also like them as a topping on my pizza. Speaking of which - a well prepared veggie pizza can be incredibly delicious!
 
  • Like
Reactions: crimsonaudio
I'm close to reaching the point of "just die then" after six years of this crap.

Note: blood donor centers DO NOT ask the vaccination status of people nice enough to donate blood. They DO have a questionnaire asking questions, including if you've had a certain vaccination in the last several hours or days.

But a group of mental midgets with room temperature IQs and (mostly) Republican primary voting records are really showing their idiocy at this point.


I just tell them we don't offer this service locally.

Harsh, but I don't have time for RFK and all this crap. I work in real medicine. And no, Ivermectin isn't a cancer drug. Feel free to go elsewhere, but it isn't my problem.
 

Artemis II is NASA's first mission to the moon since 1972. A truly historical launch for everyone involved — except for Hansen, who is now deceased.

"No one should have to live with this type of injury," said Canadian PM Mark Carney. "When I heard about the bumpy launch, I contacted NASA immediately to make sure they put Col. Hansen out of his misery right away."
 
I used to have a fire-engine red pick-up truck when I lived in North Carolina, the Land of the Long-Leaf Pine.
Every spring, it turned orange from the pine pollen.
On Monte Sano, we have Montane longleaf, short leaf and Virginia. Thing is, it's not really that hospitable to pines and we have maybe a dozen on our three acres. Our vehicles look just like Bazz's...
 
When my black truck turns into black and gold "Vandy Truck..." the claritin is considered...
When I lived in Memphis, I got in the habit of taking zyrtec daily (advised by my GP), as I would get sick (allergic rfeaction) several times per year and in my work, any congestion means 'no work'.

Anyway, moving back home I realized I didn't take meds when I was younger, so I decided to stop Zyrtec. This is when I discovered that some (apparently, not a few) people become physically addicted to Zyrtec after long-term daily use. I found a hack (on reddit, of all paces) that worked to step down and now I'm sober for qlmost four months. :)

As when I was younger, the high volume of pollen in central FL doesn't bother me at all...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bazza
When I lived in Memphis, I got in the habit of taking zyrtec daily (advised by my GP), as I would get sick (allergic rfeaction) several times per year and in my work, any congestion means 'no work'.

Anyway, moving back home I realized I didn't take meds when I was younger, so I decided to stop Zyrtec. This is when I discovered that some (apparently, not a few) people become physically addicted to Zyrtec after long-term daily use. I found a hack (on reddit, of all paces) that worked to step down and now I'm sober for qlmost four months. :)

As when I was younger, the high volume of pollen in central FL doesn't bother me at all...

Indeed... We can become more or less addicted to lots of things as the brain habituates itself. I take my claritin off and on, so that my only addiction is prilosec!

Among the worst are nasal decongestants like good ole Afrin. A few days and your nose is swollen shut without repeated hits.
 
  • Like
Reactions: crimsonaudio
I found the opinion.
As I thought, the majority went after the law on First Amendment incorporation grounds:
"Colorado’s law banning conversion therapy, as applied to Ms. Chiles’s talk therapy, regulates speech based on viewpoint, and the lower courts erred by failing to apply sufficiently rigorous First Amendment scrutiny."
Supreme Court rendering any opinion at all on this case runs roughshod over the X Amendment. Since the people of the United States obviously ratified the Constitution on the express condition that the federal government could only use the powers specifically enumerated and delegated to it, the Supreme Court ruling is, in my view, in error.

Whether the law is wise or not is a separate question.
The statute defines "conversion therapy" as: "any practice or treatment . . . that attempts . . . to change an individual’s sexual orientation or gender identity,” as well as any “effor[t] to change behaviors or gender expressions or to eliminate or reduce sexual or romantic attractions toward individuals of the same sex.”
The term "conversion therapy" is an value-laden term intended to invoke an emotional knee-jerk response. It conjures up images of victims being bound to a bed with electrodes attached to their heads and shocks administered until the victim "stops being gay (or trans)." But the Colorado legislature went well beyond that with this law.
If a minor boy has come to believe that he is a girl, and his parents bring him to Ms. Chiles, and Ms. Chiles tells the boy that he is, in fact, a boy, that is "conversion therapy" and thus illegal under this statue.
 
In 2011, a neuroscientist at MIT named Dr. Li-Huei Tsai made a discovery that should have been on the front page of every newspaper on Earth.

She exposed mice with advanced Alzheimer's disease to a flickering light pulsing at exactly 40 Hz — forty flashes per second. Nothing else. No drugs. No surgery. Just light at a specific frequency.

Within one hour, the amyloid-beta plaques in their brains — the protein deposits that define Alzheimer's — began to dissolve. Not slow. Not gradually. Within sixty minutes.

After seven days of daily 40 Hz exposure, plaque levels dropped by 50%. The mice regained memory function. Their neurons began firing in synchrony again. The brain's immune cells — microglia — activated and started clearing the toxic buildup like a cleaning crew that had been asleep for years.

The study was published in Nature. The most prestigious scientific journal on the planet. Peer-reviewed. Replicated. Confirmed.

That was 2016. It is now 2026.

40 million people worldwide have Alzheimer's. The pharmaceutical industry generates $13 billion per year from Alzheimer's drugs that do not reverse the disease. Not one of them. They slow it. Maybe. Temporarily. At $26,000 per year per patient.

A 40 Hz light costs less than a dollar to produce.

Dr. Tsai is still at MIT. Her research continues. Phase III human trials are underway. But you will not see this on the evening news. You will not hear your doctor mention it. You will not find it in any pharmacy.

Because a frequency that costs nothing cannot sustain a $13 billion industry.

The light is 40 Hz. The frequency is real. The science is published. And 40 million people are still waiting for permission to use it.

 
There have been studies in humans with Alzheimer's disease that have failed to show a substantial effect with light therapy.

International Journal of Alzheimer's

The Effect of 40-Hz Light Therapy on Amyloid Load in Patients with Prodromal and Clinical Alzheimer’s Disease​


Rola Ismail, Allan K. Hansen, Peter Parbo, Hans Brændgaard, Hanne Gottrup, David J. Brooks, Per Borghammer


It isn't clear if humans are just different from mice or what the mechanism is. The other issue is that we have plenty of drugs that can clear amyloid from the brain quite nicely... But they don't improve cognition and have side effects that are deadly at times.
 
  • Thank You
Reactions: CrimsonJazz
My latest health initiative is eating more Sardines.

In fact, I'm about to do the "3 cans per day - for 5 days" regime.

I already feel better after eating them every day for the past 5 days, along with other foods. Now I'm about to go all in on just the Sardines and see what happens. I'm drinking a sugar free electrolyte beverage, as well.

Omega 3's!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: crimsonaudio
I believe part of the scientific method is (or should be) healthy skepticism. As I have related the ancient Vulcan proverb, "Challenge your assumptions or they will challenge you."
There needs to be a bit of humility in scientific inquiry.
As we saw during Covid, too many accepted as Gospel Truth certain assertions (e.g. 6 feet of separation will prevent spreading Covid, two weeks to stop the spread, masks will protect you from Covid, the vaccine will prevent you from getting Covid) and challengers were declared blasphemers and banished from public discourse. It would have been a lot better if we had said, "We believe ___. This is the best estimate based on the information on hand now. If and when we get better info, we will adjust accordingly."
 
I believe part of the scientific method is (or should be) healthy skepticism. As I have related the ancient Vulcan proverb, "Challenge your assumptions or they will challenge you."
There needs to be a bit of humility in scientific inquiry.
As we saw during Covid, too many accepted as Gospel Truth certain assertions (e.g. 6 feet of separation will prevent spreading Covid, two weeks to stop the spread, masks will protect you from Covid, the vaccine will prevent you from getting Covid) and challengers were declared blasphemers and banished from public discourse. It would have been a lot better if we had said, "We believe ___. This is the best estimate based on the information on hand now. If and when we get better info, we will adjust accordingly."
Screenshot_2026_04_07_2248291775627351.jpg
 
This is a good one... Lots of misdirection... And most of these predate modern science and modern medicine, which really didn't start until 1945 after World War II resulted in a surge of good medical research. Many of the old practices persisted simply due to the fact there were no effective alternatives at the time. And many of these topics are far more complicated and nuanced than a convenient meme.

Bloodletting for fever was an archaic practice, it faded in the 1800's after being used for at least 2000 years. An 1836 paper was important in disproving its effects. I can only apologize that as a hematologist my direct predecessors killed George Washington, even if the quinsy wasn't gonna get him. We still bleed people for hemochromatosis and polycythemia rubra vera by the way, so not all bloodletting is without a scientific basis.

Mercury does cure the chancre sores that are seen in syphilis, so there was an objective response seen there. By 1900 as proto-modern medicine began, we switched out for arsenicals, which actually did work, although poorly and with high toxicity. It was the best one could get until Penicillin G became available in the late 1940s.

Radium water was sold by patent medicine hucksters. It never achieved any significant legitimacy within the field of medicine. We like to think we are smarter now... But just wait until one of the peptides RFK is touting without any evidence is found to cause cancer due to pro-angiogenic effects... The FDA issues warnings about good ole Radithor, but did not have the legal authority to ban it!

Lobotomies were used for schizophrenia from the 1930s to the 1950s, and actually resulted in improvement for many patients, although the side effects were dreadful. Scientific studies were done showing they could help the severely afflicted. They were abandoned when Thorazine became the first effective pharmacologic agent.

Everyone smoked... and it took until 1950 for definitive proof of the linkage with lung cancer to be published. It is rather a black mark that doctors promoted it that way though.

Heroin... I have nothing to say... It was supposed to be a safe and effective treatment for "morphinism" except for the fact it hits the brain 10x faster than morphine and is much more addictive. For those who want to do away with the compromised FDA and let companies promote their products without a gate keeper... An early warning for you.

DDT... Was hugely important in malaria control and saved millions and millions of lives... It was banned only a decade after Rachel Carson published her research and wrote Silent Spring, which resulted in a massive rethinking of environmental toxins. DDT impregnated mosquito netting is still used in many parts of the world. And yes, governments did spray them in schools, because the kids had a much higher mortality rate from malaria and no better option, although this changed as the toxicities became apparent.

Dietary fat sourced from animals, saturated fats, and trans fats do indeed cause cardiovascular disease. This is well documented and not in question. By the same token, high meat diets, particularly grilled and processed meats, do cause higher rates of cancer. Again, this data is solid. Old school margarine with transfat is in fact worse than butter, although polyunsaturated oils are superior to butter, and these make up most modern margarines.

Ahhh... Seed oils... And beef tallow. What if told you a robust and extensive set of data showed that seed oils are quite safe and clearly and significantly better for you than beef tallow? Because this is the case. This is not one of the above situations where options were slim and research was done later to show a bad effect.

Statins have never been used for "everyone over 50." They have always only been recommended for people with specific risk features. They are one of the best studied agents in the medical armamentarium and quite safe. I do think the benefits are are a bit oversold personally, but for those with risk factors, they have saved many lives. The current hate on statins is like vaccines, completely unwarranted and political in nature.



P.S. In regards to Vulcan philosophies... There are numerous studies from COVID showing masks (particularly N95 masks) can protect an individual from contracting COVID and serve as a point control to prevent the spread of COVID. They aren't perfect, but on a population level, we'd probably have been better off to ixnay all the other measures taken and just have everyone wear the best mask they could get... Although, several studies showed that school closures were the strongest method for reducing COVID spread if you want to break out the political fireworks.

P.P.S. And yes... the COVID vaccines were pitiful in terms of preventing the spread of many strains of the virus (although they actually did a great job on the original strain, which is why they were initially touted this way) but the data show robust and durable protection from death and severely morbid outcomes including hospitalization. Estimates suggest 17 million hospital admissions were averted! So keep the prize in mind... Not dying. Not dying is extremely good for one's health. It turns out, respiratory viruses are particularly hard to prevent with vaccines, as we see with the flu.

P.P.P.S. This was some real fun guys! I did have to research some of these topics, happy to provide links and will post some good summaries on Statins and Seed Oils since these topics are trending right now.
 
Last edited:
Nice summary from Open Evidence...

Yes, seed oils (soybean, corn, sunflower, safflower, canola) are safe and are healthier than beef tallow based on robust evidence from clinical trials and large prospective studies. [1-2] The American Heart Association explicitly recommends using liquid plant oils rather than animal fats like butter, lard, and tallow. [1]

Cardiovascular outcomes favor seed oils over animal fats. A 2024 JAMA Internal Medicine study of over 407,000 participants found that higher intake of vegetable oil fat was associated with 12-15% lower overall mortality and 14-15% lower CVD mortality, while animal fat intake was associated with 14-16% higher mortality. [3] Replacing 5% of energy from animal fat with plant fat (including vegetable oils) reduced overall mortality by 4-24% and CVD mortality by 5-30%. [3]

The claim that omega-6 fatty acids cause inflammation is not supported by evidence. Multiple clinical trials demonstrate that increased linoleic acid intake (the primary omega-6 in seed oils) does not increase markers of inflammation or oxidative stress. [2][4] A 2026 cross-sectional analysis found that higher serum omega-6 and linoleic acid concentrations were actually inversely associated with inflammatory biomarkers including hs-CRP and glycoprotein acetyls. [5] A comprehensive review in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology concluded that concerns about the omega-6 to omega-3 ratio are "partly formed on the basis of a number of incorrect and simplified assumptions." [4]

The mechanisms underlying seed oil benefits include lowering LDL cholesterol, reducing triglycerides, improving insulin sensitivity, and enhancing endothelial function. [3][6] Soybean oil specifically has been shown to lower circulating cholesterol levels and reduce coronary heart disease risk without affecting inflammatory biomarkers. [7]

Current evidence-based guidelines recommend vegetable oils rich in unsaturated fats "instead of rich sources of SFA, including butter, tallow, lard, palm and coconut oils." [2]


Edit: Please see above in this post where I boldly state I like steaks. All in moderation.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Emphasis!
Reactions: UAH and Huckleberry
Advertisement

Trending content

Advertisement

Latest threads