Additional penalties for targeting resulting in injury?

  • Hi Guest, we are working on updating the site servers and software. We're also 'forcing' everyone to read and agree to our site privacy policy and terms of service. There are no significant changes to either of these but the terms page does clarify a few things that are mostly in the legalese. You can just click the checkbox for both and continue using the site as usual! We'll update you more on the site upgrades VERY soon! THANK YOU AS ALWAYS for supporting the site and being an active participant!

TNBama

1st Team
Apr 19, 2000
979
152
167
61
Knoxville, TN. USA
After watching that brutal targeting by Mizzou, I can't help but think a targeting that results in an injury should include an additional 2 halves of ejection. That hit could have paralyzed. It could be a decision made by the league after the game, for extensive review and to make sure the player was truly injured. Thoughts?
 

jthomas666

TideFans Legend
Aug 14, 2002
25,183
15,126
287
62
Birmingham & Warner Robins
After watching that brutal targeting by Mizzou, I can't help but think a targeting that results in an injury should include an additional 2 halves of ejection. That hit could have paralyzed. It could be a decision made by the league after the game, for extensive review and to make sure the player was truly injured. Thoughts?
How do you verify injuries without violating HIPAA?
 

BamaMoon

Hall of Fame
Apr 1, 2004
23,382
21,927
282
Boone, NC
How in the world do you do that when they can't get half the initial "targeting" violations called???

"Targeting" or leading with the crown needs to be removed from the game, but up to this point, the officials don't seem to understand it, nor do we.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rja4bama