My befuddlement with the offense is well document. To speak about things such as the lack of offensive consistency is anathema to many: We are not the coaches and the coaches know best. Of course it is sadly true. I am not the coach as evidenced by my salary.
After a year and of half with this present offensive, players and system, it is what it is. Against Ole Sis, the primary running formation was two tight ends, qb under center and TB deep....a pro style set. It was not successful, but there had to be a reason for the decision to go with this set.
Perhaps the reason the coaches ran from this set is because the pistol is more suited for a running qb? And as many have said, it is possible that the lack of success in the running game is directly affected by the lack of a true deep threat. Obviously, if this were true, then the coaches would make the proper changes in the schemes and personnel.
Mysteries abound and I don't have the answers, but I do so enjoy discussing such matters.
After a year and of half with this present offensive, players and system, it is what it is. Against Ole Sis, the primary running formation was two tight ends, qb under center and TB deep....a pro style set. It was not successful, but there had to be a reason for the decision to go with this set.
Perhaps the reason the coaches ran from this set is because the pistol is more suited for a running qb? And as many have said, it is possible that the lack of success in the running game is directly affected by the lack of a true deep threat. Obviously, if this were true, then the coaches would make the proper changes in the schemes and personnel.
Mysteries abound and I don't have the answers, but I do so enjoy discussing such matters.