Interesting article on the demise of BSC. Essentially throws Pollick under the bus. Pollick says it was in bad financial shape when he got there.
www.birminghamlede.com
It’s an interesting summary of 20 years of problems, mis-steps and mis-management.
A few quibbles — the article quotes the ups and downs of BSC’s endowment. But it doesn’t ask (or even address) what caused the ups and downs. As in, when BSC’s troubles started to get really serious in 2008, the stock market as a whole was tanking. How much of the endowment’s decline was due to spending and how much was due to market fluctuations? No clue.
Likewise, the article credits Krulak (Pollick’s successor) with increasing the endowment. But he was in the chair during a time of fast-rising stock values. How much of the increase was Krulak’s doing, and how much was him being a boat floating on a rising tide of stock valuations? Again, no clue.
A clergyman / member of BSC’s Board of Trustees is quoted as “hyperventilating” when Pollick told them that BSC had dipped into the endowment for $5 million to pay operating expenses. Did the good reverend voice opposition? Did he fight it? Did he demand fiscal responsibility? The article doesn’t say. But I’m guessing not because all the former Trustee does is point fingers.
Finally it accurately mentions three students burning a number of rural churches, and that causing both a PR problem and a financial problem when BSC stepped in to help rebuild the churches. It inaccurately says that the congregations were predominantly Black. Some were, some weren’t. The perps didn’t know or care. They just wanted to burn churches.
The Birmingham News

It’s an interesting summary of 20 years of problems, mis-steps and mis-management.
A few quibbles — the article quotes the ups and downs of BSC’s endowment. But it doesn’t ask (or even address) what caused the ups and downs. As in, when BSC’s troubles started to get really serious in 2008, the stock market as a whole was tanking. How much of the endowment’s decline was due to spending and how much was due to market fluctuations? No clue.
Likewise, the article credits Krulak (Pollick’s successor) with increasing the endowment. But he was in the chair during a time of fast-rising stock values. How much of the increase was Krulak’s doing, and how much was him being a boat floating on a rising tide of stock valuations? Again, no clue.
A clergyman / member of BSC’s Board of Trustees is quoted as “hyperventilating” when Pollick told them that BSC had dipped into the endowment for $5 million to pay operating expenses. Did the good reverend voice opposition? Did he fight it? Did he demand fiscal responsibility? The article doesn’t say. But I’m guessing not because all the former Trustee does is point fingers.
Finally it accurately mentions three students burning a number of rural churches, and that causing both a PR problem and a financial problem when BSC stepped in to help rebuild the churches. It inaccurately says that the congregations were predominantly Black. Some were, some weren’t. The perps didn’t know or care. They just wanted to burn churches.