Here it is hot off the press
http://www.tidesports.com/article/20061125/NEWS/61125001/1067/SPORTS0106
Roll Tide
Kevin
http://www.tidesports.com/article/20061125/NEWS/61125001/1067/SPORTS0106
Roll Tide
Kevin
Yep. Couldn't put it more bluntly than that.Cecil says it best no news is bad news.
Really! There was nothing there that hasn't been posted 15 other times on here.Sounds like he read RTO22's comments from the other day and made an article out of them. What a poser...![]()
As numerous sources have confirmed, that is precisely what he did propose -- no staff changes, no real change in direction. And it was, and is, exactly what no one wanted (or wants) to hear.
Really! There was nothing there that hasn't been posted 15 other times on here.
What sources? Did I miss this? Did Mal Moore or anyone from the U of A say in this behind a mic or in front of a camera?
I usually like reading Cecil Hurt but this whole deal has even gotten Cecil writing things that everybody has heard on sports radio or off the net. Not 1 bit of news in that article.
One thing newspaper writers usually do well is sum up things... that is, they'll take a bunch of tidbits here and there and put some continuity to them. You are correct that CH has not said anything ground-breaking or new... but note the fact that he has connected these various ideas with interesting threads. :wink:Really! There was nothing there that hasn't been posted 15 other times on here.
What sources? Did I miss this? Did Mal Moore or anyone from the U of A say in this behind a mic or in front of a camera?
I usually like reading Cecil Hurt but this whole deal has even gotten Cecil writing things that everybody has heard on sports radio or off the net. Not 1 bit of news in that article.
As of Saturday, no one had said -- on or off the record -- that the point of no return for Shula’s tenure had been reached. But it’s hard to look at the events that have unfolded -- or to hear the rumblings that started weeks ago -- and draw any other conclusion.
I really doubt that. CH has no axe to grind with Mike Shula, far from it from all indications. He's paid to offer his opinion and does so as clearly as he can.Cecil has been on Shula for a while. I think his final straw was when Shula totally dismissed Cecil's, "Shula's offense is fundamentally flawed" article like he was some kind of hack.
Information from "sources" usually means someone credible has made a comment off the record (thought was simple common sense?). And i think the article is more of an editorial than a factual outline of anything (again, common sense?).
Bottom line is this, does anyone honestly believe that C Hurt is going to be backpedaling on this article down the road? I don't.
I agree. The thing that speaks loudest right now is the silence. I don't know what is going to happen, but the silence is pretty telling...Everybody that has said that Shula wasn't going had "sources". Those who said he was gone had "sources". People with "sources" have said SOS is our next coach. Those with "sources" say we want get him. Same with Saban and so on. My "simple common sense" has figured out that all these sources can't be right.