Yes, it was a totally different situation. I just thought it dumb that the NCAA wouldn't even let an institution offer footballs to non-profit organizations (especially a school) as a fundraising aid for that organization. Of course I guess this could be kind of lead into a situation such as a rich booster making a "donation" to a "Reverend's" dilapidated church...or something like that.See? In that case, you made them aware that it was going to be raffled (sold). In a mall signing, everyone knows it, but it's not made obvious. However, who can believe that all of the AU players with jerseys up for sale in eBay are totally unaware that that they're being sold?
That was when you accused me of being a Democrat. That should have been "D" in the list of when I bring it up...basically, only as a defense for some sort of defamation against which I've proven myself throughout the time I have been a member.The only reason I brought up you talking about how long someone has been here is that your first post to me said something to the effect that I hadn't been around here very long, therefore I didn't know what I was talking about. That thread was NOT in the football forum, it was in the "Otherboards" forum. You get something in your head and you won't let it go no matter how much someone shows you that you're wrong. THAT'S what I was talking about and you know it.
We're leaving to go on vacation tomorrow, but if it we're for that, I'd be scouring!As far as the AJ vs. Trent case is concerned, AJ sold an autographed jersey. There's no proof showing Trent has sold or receiving anything in return for an autograph. Everything else is just typical. This issue is basically *ubarn's Operation Red Dog of 2011.
BTW, if you live in *ubarn and just so happen to pass by any storefront windows containing autographed memorabilia, or anything related to the promotion of current players, don't be scared to take a few pics and leak them online.![]()
My daughter got a $1000 credit card straight out of high school through the mail and she wasn't an athlete. She had many other offers too so why would anyone think Julio or any other college kid wouldn't get those offers as well. Julio might have a rich uncle or as kids do sometimes borrow clothes/suits from others.Travis and his AU cohorts are trying to assert that since Julio Jones has been photographed in ten different suits, something must be amiss. The implication is subtly racist, and unless there's a smoking gun out there, I don't think the NCAA gives a fig about what suit a player wears on game day.
Someone help me out with this - the Tuscaloosa News described T-Town Menswear as "high-end." I have my doubts. What brands does the store carry and how much are we looking at per suit?
(Travis and his idiot trolls also forget that the players can still apply for student loans on top of their scholarships, which may provide a decent amount of spending money.)
No. People can make their own custom covers.Isn't that a violation?
I think there is a website where you can design your own cover to slip in the box of the game. May actually be real but created by an individual.Pretty sure this is photoshopped.
I wouldn't say that the story couldn't change as I get more detail, but, so far, I've been being reassured...Yes, it was a totally different situation. I just thought it dumb that the NCAA wouldn't even let an institution offer footballs to non-profit organizations (especially a school) as a fundraising aid for that organization. Of course I guess this could be kind of lead into a situation such as a rich booster making a "donation" to a "Reverend's" dilapidated church...or something like that.
haha...how does that song go...oops there it is ..send that over to Mr. poop head Clay Travis
Also because Outkickthecoverage wasn't setting the world on fire with its traffic numbers, even after the launch:I'm going to repeat what I said earlier in the thread. This wouldn't be an issue with Clay Travis, Brooks or anyone else if there weren't pictures of Trent signing things in the store. That is what "caught" his attention. The eBay stuff isn't new. He's just trying to make this a story because of the location of the pictures.
What gets me is the fact that there is pictures out there in the first place shows me there is nothing to be hiding from. It ain't like he discovered some kind of cover up like what Tressell tried to do at Ohio State. I never seen any pics of Pryor getting a tattoo in a tattoo parlor. Is he saying our compliance office is trying to cover up infractions after all the infractions Bama has self reported over the past several years? Ludicrous!I'm going to repeat what I said earlier in the thread. This wouldn't be an issue with Clay Travis, Brooks or anyone else if there weren't pictures of Trent signing things in the store. That is what "caught" his attention. The eBay stuff isn't new. He's just trying to make this a story because of the location of the pictures.
still trying to figure out why this got me accused of being a barner?Pretty sure this is photoshopped.
I think the person who did it meant it toward to original poster of the pic.still trying to figure out why this got me accused of being a barner?
Okay, okay, you're right it isn't a good welcome if you are truly solid to Alabama.."you've used an easy moniker, you joined in April and you have 3 posts. I smell the cows..."
I didn't say anything anti-Bama, so basically the argument is new member=Auburn fan. Not a great "welcome to the board" is it.
I think the poster who said that to you thought you had posted it originally, of course I dont know that for sure. When reading through it originally, thats what I thought anyway. Dont worry about it too much, its a touchy subject and being a new poster comes with some raised eyebrows."you've used an easy moniker, you joined in April and you have 3 posts. I smell the cows..."
I didn't say anything anti-Bama, so basically the argument is new member=Auburn fan. Not a great "welcome to the board" is it.