Okay:
1. We did ran condensed offense. This has been said many times from people who is close to the program.
Alabama football's Kalen DeBoer: much of offense won't be installed
The offense he really want to run requires different skillset at QB, OL and WR.
2. The RBs had same issue that we had last year: they couldn't find a hole to run through. Part of that is on RBs and their RB coach. Gillespie is the holdover from last year.
3. On Sheridan: You're trying to force a square in a circle argument. How many games did he call game clean this season? He called run plays in passing situation. he called passing plays in run situation. He isn't very good at finding rhythm with playcalling.
4. The OL- Again you're finding very reason to blame Milroe.. You pretty much proved the point. OL play was real bad this year, but yet you choose to ingore that part and blame it on Milroe 100 percent. The Tackles at both side gave up the most sacks this year.
5. How could you tell Milroe to transfer when he held the team together after CNS retired? This was Milroe's team. Like I said before... Gotta take emotion out of this and see things differently. I didn't want to go back and forth with everyone... But it seems like everyone isn't understanding the point I made and just chose to find a way to pile it on Milroe but isn't seeing the big picture... I hate that for some of us. But anyway Like I said to everyone... Nobody dont have to agree with me, but I'm not going back and forth with Milroe. My position on the situation still stand and I'm looking at it from netural perspective. I shared my thoughts on this.. and it's whatever. Happy new year! See you guys soon!
No, you are NOT neutral. not at all and not even close.
100% agree we ran a very, very skinny offense. We had very little variability in what we could run this season. Some have said it's as low as 10% of the total possible playbook.
Yes, CKD said "There's going to be a lot of our offense that we never install this year, just because of the players that we have,"
that 'player gap' had ZERO to do with the TE, WR or RB groups. ZERO. It also had very, very little to do with the OL, and the part that did have to do with the OL was certain types of run blocking schemes they used at UW, but there were still plenty of run concepts we could use. Almost all of the limitations had to do with the QB. Just like CTR had to completely change what we wanted to do in 2023; NILroe couldn't execute a comprehensive offense. CKD only said 'players' because it's not like he can come out and say "well, we are really going to handcuff our offense and run something totally different because Jalen can't run anything close to the offense we are known for."
So, given we are very limited due to what the QB can do, what 'adjustments' should we expect Sheridan to make? The things he'd normally try to take advantage of what the defense was doing, were not things the QB could do. Almost NONE of the passing playbook was in reach because NILroe couldn't do it. he tried some of that against UM and what happened? WRs running WIDE open in the layers concepts the scheme is designed around and NILroe didn't make the throws - most of the time he never appeared to even see the receiver or even know where to look.
On the OL, even NILroe said that over half the sacks in the 23 season were on him, and he was being generous to himself. He does the exact opposite of what a QB should do with edge pressure, plus he holds onto the ball longer than any QB in college football because he doesn't know where to go with the ball. Could the OL be a bit better - sure thing. Would it be anywhere close to this bad if we had a QB who could call the right protections, climb the pocket with edge pressure or simply throw a quick hot pass over blitzing pressure? HECK NO. Those are all things we'd expect ANY QB to do with some degree of consistently. Remember, we had a much maligned center leave the program, go to a team still in the playoffs, be voted UNAMINOUS All-American and win the Remington award as the nations best center. I wonder what changed for him?
That's all without him giving away the fact that he's passing the ball so that the edge guys can pin it back without hesitation.
The Crimson Tide quarterback's pre-snap stance often revealed Alabama's approach, making it easier on the Maize and Blue defense.
www.si.com
"Alabama's veteran signal-caller lined up differently before each play, offsetting his feet on pass plays and lining up with feet parallel to the line of scrimmage on running plays. Milroe's tendency eliminates the biggest advantage any offense has in football, surprise."
which he's been doing much of the season apparently, and the coaches have been all over him to fix it, but here we are after 20 something starts and 4 years in a college career and he can't fix a basic flaw of making sure his feet are right before every play.
Yes, it was NILroes team, or at least some of it was. He bought their loyalty with LANK NIL funds. It would have been a hard choice, but not doing it (going back to Saban actually) cost us two productive years, and resulted in the most fractured locker room we've had in ages. You really think that what we are seeing in the WR room reflects that this is really NILroes team? I'm sure you saw the open frustration from all the guys playing against UM. You really think that a lot of the skill position guys didn't want a change in a really big way (hint - some of them told the coaches a change needed to be made, and the way the coaches handled it is why some of them are leaving.) If the WRs who are in practice seeing how the two guys perform are calling for change, there could be something there right?
Fact is, the ONLY reason NILroe got the job in the first place, and then held onto it was NIL funding to the other players and that limited everything, so yes all the downstream effects are on NILroe. He manipulated things to set this stage and be in the spotlight, so it's all on him.