And here we go...
Protective order issued after threatening girlfriend
The dispute before the court arose in December 2019 when Zackey Rahimi and his girlfriend, with whom he shares a child, had an argument in a parking lot. The government claimed that Rahimi threatened to take the child away and then dragged his girlfriend back to the car, retrieved a gun and fired at a nearby witness.
In February 2020, the girlfriend was granted a protective order finding that Rahimi had committed family violence. The order also suspended his handgun license and prohibited him from possessing a firearm.
Beginning that December, Rahimi took part in five shootings in Texas, culminating on January 7, 2021, when he fired shots in the air at a Whataburger restaurant after his friend’s credit card was declined.
When the police ultimately obtained a search warrant for his home, they found a rifle and a pistol and Rahimi admitted that he was subject to the protective order that had been entered in the civil proceeding.
A federal grand jury indicted him, and Rahimi moved to dismiss the indictment arguing that the law was unconstitutional. He lost his court effort.
But then the Supreme Court issued its Second Amendment decision in Bruen.
After reviewing the decision, the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals
ruled in favor of Rahimi, saying that Bruen “fundamentally changed our analysis of laws that implicate the Second Amendment, rendering our prior precedent obsolete.â€Â
The judges pointed to the holding that the government must justify a gun regulation as consistent with the nation’s “historical tradition.â€Â
The statute, the 5th Circuit wrote, is an “outlier that our ancestors would never have accepted.â€Â
_____
So we today are confined only to what someone 250 years ago thought about the world and cannot decide for ourselves?
What a crock of something I can't say on TF.