He'll let us know in two weeks.So, where does that leave us now?
He'll let us know in two weeks.So, where does that leave us now?
Absolutely.Yep. That's one of the problems in the entire big picture. That also was before the influx of Russians following the latest invasion...
That was the case in the cities of Donetsk (taken over by Russia in 2014) and Mariupol (taken over by Russia in 2022).I wasn't aware of that. So you're saying that many civilians came in from Russia behind the Russian army into a war zone?
This is true. It is the deliberate policy of the Russian government to sponsor Russian settlers brought into the occupied portions of Ukraine.That was the case in the cities of Donetsk (taken over by Russia in 2014) and Mariupol (taken over by Russia in 2022).
On the other hand, pro-Ukrainians have run out of these places further west—some into the unoccupied parts of eastern Ukraine, and some into central or western Ukraine.
True. It takes many years before it's solid. I've watched the Latinization of the Südtirol, both from a distance and afar, sometimes with input from the inhabitants themselves. The Tirolers themselves think of themselves as Tirolers first, and secondarily as Austrians or Germans. If they think of themselves as Italians at all, it's a far distant third. The Italian government has had a century to try to supplant inherent nationalism with only minimal success...This is true. It is the deliberate policy of the Russian government to sponsor Russian settlers brought into the occupied portions of Ukraine.
I suspect these "settlers" are like the German settlers brought into occupied Polish and Soviet territories by the Nazis in the early 1940s. They live precariously and have not put roots down too deep because they might have to bug out on short order.
Success in blunting some of the Russians' tactical offensives will not bring about grand strategic success. The German blunted Soviet offensives all the way from Stalingrad to Berlin, but they still ended up in Berlin. Joe Johnston blunted Sherman's tactical offensive maneuvers all the way from Chattanooga to Atlanta, but he still ended up in Atlanta (where he was relieved of command).Following the setbacks due to Russian advances last week, there are positive news in the Ukrainian counteroffensive this week. Ukrainian forces were able to recapture most of the land lost to the Russians last week and killed hundreds / captured dozens of Russians. Hard to know the exact number of dead Russians, but what has happened is that Russians have pushed their soldiers to attack a failed Ukrainian defense without any aerial, artillery, or tank support. They got cut off and then were slowly destroyed by the Ukrainian air force using GBU bombs and artillery.
Here is the map:
View attachment 52213
Business as usual.We sure did roll out the red carpet for Putin. Absolutely nothing happened and Trump looked weak.
Why not compare the other way, i.e., when everyone was giving up on the USSR when Guderian’s tanks were a few dozen miles from Moscow?Success in blunting some of the Russians' tactical offensives will not bring about grand strategic success. The German blunted Soviet offensives all the way from Stalingrad to Berlin, but they still ended up in Berlin. Joe Johnston blunted Sherman's tactical offensive maneuvers all the way from Chattanooga to Atlanta, but he still ended up in Atlanta (where he was relieved of command).
Sadly, the trend of the front lines in Ukraine is ever westward. I do not know how Ukraine can change that trend.
Who was "giving up on the USSR" in 1941? The Brits did not. They kept Lend-Lease going all winter. Stalin did not. He stayed in Moscow.Why not compare the other way, i.e., when everyone was giving up on the USSR when Guderian’s tanks were a few dozen miles from Moscow?
The problem with associations is that they can be twisted to fit your narrative.
For the sake of discussion, you are the President of the United States, what do you do about Ukraine?Why not compare the other way, i.e., when everyone was giving up on the USSR when Guderian’s tanks were a few dozen miles from Moscow?
The problem with associations is that they can be twisted to fit your narrative.
Yet, this is the graph of Ukrainian territory losses over time:Who was "giving up on the USSR" in 1941? The Brits did not. They kept Lend-Lease going all winter. Stalin did not. He stayed in Moscow.
And this is no argument by analogy. It is merely stating the obvious fact that cutting off and crushing selected Russian penetration, while good on its own, is still strategically defensive. To win the war (as victory is currently defined by Ukraine), Ukraine has to assume the strategic offensive and push the Russians out of Ukrainian territory. No amount blunting Russia's tactical offensives is going to liberate Mariupol, Sebastopol, Donetsk or Lugansk (unless the Ukrainian strategy is to get the Russian army to quit wholesale on the scale of 1918, but the weaker out-attriting the stronger power is really unusual).
Let's try this.
Today the population of Russia is 143M
Ukraine's is 39M
Russia's GDP is $2,000B
Ukraine's is $179B
Ukraine, with significant external military support (hardware, but not European boots on the ground fighting alongside Ukrainian troops) may be postured to blunt further Russian tactical offensives. Taking the strategic offensive and pushing Russian troops out of Ukrainian territory is simply beyond Ukrainian means, even with a lot of external military support. There is a strategic ends-ways-means imbalance. The ends are too grandiose for the means at hand. And I have yet to see a game-changing way the Ukrainians can take advantage of.
I’ve replied on this question several days ago: https://www.tidefans.com/forums/threads/russia-invades-ukraine-xviii.339188/post-4344586For the sake of discussion, you are the President of the United States, what do you do about Ukraine?
I understand that Russia's advances are glacial, but Ukraine's stated policy is to push that line past where it was in 2022, all the way down to zero.
The Germans were fighting a multi front war. They were fighting in Africa, Western Europe, and Italy at different points along with smaller fronts. The USSR was superior in population and production as the war ramped up. This doesn't take into account the US and British production the Germans had to deal with as well. They also had the US and Brits pouring supplies and material into their war effort. The Russian army was driving America trucks and eating Spam. There is really no comparison to WW2 and the USSR's situation.Why not compare the other way, i.e., when everyone was giving up on the USSR when Guderian’s tanks were a few dozen miles from Moscow?
The problem with associations is that they can be twisted to fit your narrative.
I've got good news.I’ve replied on this question several days ago: https://www.tidefans.com/forums/threads/russia-invades-ukraine-xviii.339188/post-4344586
Advances in warfare are slow until they aren't. If the dam breaks it can go bad quick. I know you understand that better than anyone on this board.I understand that Russia's advances are glacial, but Ukraine's stated policy is to push that line past where it was in 2022, all the way down to zero.
Is that morally right? Absolutely. Ukraine has every right to liberate every square cm of its territory. And I hope they do.
Is it realistic?
Absolutely, but that cuts both ways. The Russian front could collapse or the Ukrainian front. Especially in a society in which dissent is suppressed, you never know how close that is until it happens.Advances in warfare are slow until they aren't. If the dam breaks it can go bad quick. I know you understand that better than anyone on this board.
Alabama Crimson Tide Car Door Light
Get this and many more items at our TideFans.shop!
Purchases may result in a commission being paid to TideFans.