Now you're just going out of your way to blame Sheridan with this comment, and honestly your overall take. This is just a ridiculous take. If plays produce wide-open WRs, at that point it's the players' job to execute. Not for Sheridan to jump out of the booth and do it for them. Coaches coach, call plays to produce opportunities and the players' job is to execute. Milroe torpedoed a lot of opportunities and there's no way around it, no matter how hard you try to explain it away.
Sheridan called plays that had Michigan dead to rights, but Milroe completely missed the wr's. Hell, it was so bad the commentators started pointing it out and our own wr's were showing public frustration. Sheridan did his job, Milroe just didn't do his.
Sheridan called plays that had Michigan dead to rights, but Milroe completely missed the wr's. Hell, it was so bad the commentators started pointing it out and our own wr's were showing public frustration. Sheridan did his job, Milroe just didn't do his.
In basketball it's pretty common to dare someone to take a shot if you know they can't shoot. I said stuff like this dating back to Hurts time, it isn't about drawing up a play that hypothetically works. It's about drawing up a play that actually works.
In this case, the key to beating Alabama with Sheridan/Milroe is not to cover all the receivers, it's to shut down Milroe on the ground. Alabama's two best games (Georgia and LSU), Milroe ran all over them. You know what his averages were in the losses? 1.4, .8, .5 and .4. This from someone that averaged 4.3 per rush. These defenses knew how to beat Alabama, and it wasn't by covering the receivers, it was just by stopping Milroe on the ground. Who is responsible to counter that though? Figuring out a way around that? It's the coordinator, he's supposed to outsmart those guys who knew it was alright to leave guys open as long as Milroe wasn't comfortable running around.
College kids are morons. It's herding cats. Just look at the transfer portal. You're not dealing with smart kids making smart choices most of the time, you're dealing with dumb kids making dumb choices. This means you need an offensive coordinator that can deal with things even when you have a bunch of idiots out there doing dumb stuff. You need to be able to achieve with adversity, because that's the only given. There will always be adversity.
So I don't care how someone does when everything is going great, that's easy. Even Locksley looked great when he didn't have adversity, and then when it did hit? It might as well have been a brick wall. So I don't care how anyone performs under ideal circumstances, I care how they perform under the toughest adversity because that's where you win championships.
The way I see it Sheridan got baited into putting it all on Milroe's arm to win games where Milroe's arm was never going to win games. Alabama only handed off 12 times against Michigan and all we're talking about is open receivers. Sounds to me like the gameplan Michigan had worked quite well. Sheridan's? Not so much...