And if you were Donald Trump's wife, your husband would scrog a porn star and pay her for not having sex with her, too.
Yes, I look at what this White House does and who they appoint and it just oozes seriousness. If by serious you mean "this is satire, right?"
What's his thing with bleached blondes?
Proof of something he should have said?
What horse crap.
www.theguardian.com
Mainstream media certainly has its faults, but using these particular instances a examples is the worst kind of bad faith argument. If you can't see the difference, that's your problem, not the media's.
I didn't much care for Garland (seemed like the very definition of a "beta") but he sure did a good job of shutting down the domestic terrorists that were disrupting school board meetings. I agree that wasn't political, it was just something that needed to be done.
Talk about horse crap! Look, this investigation started in 2020 and for reasons known only to the Biden administration, it was stopped. Now it has restarted and obviously there is something there. According to the article linked, two days before the book was released, the NSC advised Bolton's lawyer that the manuscript contained classified information.
If by slighted, you mean hoax after hoax meant to derail campaigns and interfere with his presidency, then I admit, I have to agree.
When you hate the media and the establishment as much as I do, it won't come off as a bad faith argument. It only seems that way, because you supported any and all bad faith arguments put forth against a person you hate. Personally, I still maintain that Trump is a **** and always has been. That doesn't change the fact that the coordinated efforts between the media and the establishment parties to side-step the wishes of the electorate is something that I will never agree with or condone. I certainly wouldn't condone such behavior against say.....Obama. My stance would not change one iota.
Ooh, ooh and don't forget those nutty TLM Catholics who were obviously trying to bring back the crusades. Thank God this disaster was averted!!
Let's look at the crux of your argument: "Now it has restarted and obviously there is something there." The argument parses out like this:
Well, of course you wouldn't--they don't have an irrational hatred of themselves.
So, it won't come across as a bad faith argument, provided one has the same irrational hatred of the media as you. Got it.
Really? You seem to live for it.
To say the FBI was at the time an independent agency is as laughable as saying it is now. The FBI was up to its eyeballs in political theater with the Russia gate stuff. Understand I'm not saying Trump was right to take the documents. I don't think he was, but any assertion that the FBI wasn't biased and weaponized under Obama, Biden, and now Trump is to ignore reality.What horse crap.
Mar a lago was raided after multiple requests from the FBI regarding Trump's possession of classified documents. In addition, the FBI was at the time an independent agency; furthermore, one would be hard pressed to make the argument that Merrick Garland pursued a political agenda while AG.
on the other hand,
Trump put toadies in as AG and FBI director after spending his campaign promising retribution for anyone who had slighted him.
as a reminder:
John Bolton raid shows weaponization of FBI against Patel’s ‘gangsters’ list
Ex-national security adviser and Trump critic is fifth in a list of 60 to have been investigated in the last seven months
Mainstream media certainly has its faults, but using these particular instances a examples is the worst kind of bad faith argument. If you can't see the difference, that's your problem, not the media's.
Nope, nope, can't agree. It's only weaponized when "they" do it. When we do it, it's to defend democracy.
Maybe when you are talking about investigations undertaken by the police or other law enforcement body I can buy that. However, when the stage is the national political scene then I am of the strong belief that investigations both start AND stop based almost solely on political power. If Biden's AG stopped the investigation it was likely because they were told to stop.
You keep saying Russian Hoax…. But high ranking people within Trump’s campaign were charged during Trump’s presidency for inappropriate dealings with the Russian government during the election. Russian citizens were kicked out of this country for trying to influence the election towards Trump. Then when their day in court approached there all of the sudden were no prosecutors because they knew a pardon was coming from Trump. So it’s extremely disingenuous to call everything about the Russian involvement in the 2016 a “hoax” when there is verifiable proof and formal charges pointing towards there being something.
Yes, I was wondering when someone was going to point out to him that:
Alabama Crimson Tide Car Door Light
Get this and many more items at our TideFans.shop!
Purchases may result in a commission being paid to TideFans.
