Ronald Reagan and his ex-wife had a closer relationship divorced 30 years later than Trump does any of his marriages.
Yeah, I said it.
Trump's Policies XI
- Thread starter Tidewater
- Start date
Ronald Reagan and his ex-wife had a closer relationship divorced 30 years later than Trump does any of his marriages.
Yeah, I said it.
This is still the DUMBEST thing to me.
Why would ANYONE with a functioning brain cell listen to anything Donald Trump wants?
He pushed Texas to gerrymander their state worse - as if the Democrats wouldn't do the same - and the GOP (who was probably going to lose anyway) might well spend another 40 years trying to claw back in control after this round of stuff.
He puts tariffs on stuff and then can't believe other countries will do the same thing to him.
He's blown a liberal Democratic socialized medicine style hole into the deficit.
IIRC, Rick Wilson said that he wanted to do some defense spending back in 2017 that not only would have violated several treaties the US had signed to stabilize the nuclear threat but would cost something like $15 TRILLION to pull off.
Why would ANYONE listen to this guy when it comes to pretty much anything?
fwiw
Reps. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) and Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) plan to move next week to force a vote on a resolution to require authorization from Congress before President Trump can use military force against Iran.
Reps. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) and Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) plan to move next week to force a vote on a resolution to require authorization from Congress before President Trump can use military force against Iran.
New banner went up at DOJ headquarters this afternoon
This should be considered a despicable act in the eyes of all Americans (unless you're a member/enabler of the cult, then you see nothing wrong with it).
DOOCY: On Prince Andrew, do you think American associates of Jeffrey Epstein will wind up in handcuffs too?
TRUMP: I'm the expert in a way because I've been totally exonerated. That's very nice. I can actually speak about it very nicely. I think it's a shame. I did nothing.
Partial truth told (for a change): He is an expert on Epstein's American associates.
why do i get the feeling that all of the "board of peace" funds will end up in his pockets
"Trump: "I want to let you know that United States is going to make a contribution of $10 billion to the Board of Peace." (Congress has not appropriated this money!)"
"Trump: "I want to let you know that United States is going to make a contribution of $10 billion to the Board of Peace." (Congress has not appropriated this money!)"
surprise, surprise, surprise
www.techdirt.com
It Looks Like The FBI Straight Up Lied To A Judge To Get Permission To Seize Georgia Voting Records
Earlier this month, the FBI decided it was going to help Donald Trump steal back the election he’s claimed for half-a-decade was stolen from him. The state whose Secretary of State was asked …
www.techdirt.com
Washington Post gift link
After pulling out of the World Health Organization, the Trump administration is proposing spending $2 billion a year to replicate the global disease surveillance and outbreak functions the United States once helped build and accessed at a fraction of the cost, according to three administration officials briefed on the proposal.
The effort to build a U.S.-run alternative would re-create systems such as laboratories, data-sharing networks and rapid-response systems the U.S. abandoned when it announced its withdrawal from the WHO last year and dismantled the U.S. Agency for International Development, according to the officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to share internal deliberations.
While President Donald Trump accused the WHO of demanding “unfairly onerous payments,” the alternative his administration is considering carries a price tag about three times what the U.S. contributed annually to the U.N. health agency. The U.S. would build on bilateral agreements with countries and expand the presence of its health agencies to dozens of additional nations, the officials said.
“This $2 billion in funding to HHS is to build the systems and capacities to do what the WHO did for us,” one official said.
After leaving WHO, Trump officials propose more expensive replacement to duplicate it
HHS proposes spending $2 billion a year to re-create systems the U.S. accessed through the WHO at a fraction of the cost, according to officials briefed on the matter.After pulling out of the World Health Organization, the Trump administration is proposing spending $2 billion a year to replicate the global disease surveillance and outbreak functions the United States once helped build and accessed at a fraction of the cost, according to three administration officials briefed on the proposal.
The effort to build a U.S.-run alternative would re-create systems such as laboratories, data-sharing networks and rapid-response systems the U.S. abandoned when it announced its withdrawal from the WHO last year and dismantled the U.S. Agency for International Development, according to the officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to share internal deliberations.
While President Donald Trump accused the WHO of demanding “unfairly onerous payments,” the alternative his administration is considering carries a price tag about three times what the U.S. contributed annually to the U.N. health agency. The U.S. would build on bilateral agreements with countries and expand the presence of its health agencies to dozens of additional nations, the officials said.
“This $2 billion in funding to HHS is to build the systems and capacities to do what the WHO did for us,” one official said.
bwahahaha what a bunch of panty waists
apnews.com
The EEOC’s lawsuit said the company paid for lodging, meals and other benefits for attendees and paid them their salaries while excusing them from regular work duties. The agency is seeking monetary compensation for a class of men who were excluded, saying they suffered not only financial losses but “emotional pain, suffering, inconvenience, mental anguish.”
US civil rights agency sues Coca-Cola distributor for excluding men from casino work trip
The U.S. federal agency that enforces workplace civil rights is suing a regional Coca-Cola bottler for sex discrimination, alleging the company discriminated against male employees by only inviting women to a company-sponsored networking event.
apnews.com
The EEOC’s lawsuit said the company paid for lodging, meals and other benefits for attendees and paid them their salaries while excusing them from regular work duties. The agency is seeking monetary compensation for a class of men who were excluded, saying they suffered not only financial losses but “emotional pain, suffering, inconvenience, mental anguish.”
Hanging banners of himself everywhere, as all great dictators do.
If it walks like a dictator and quacks like a dictator, it is probably a dictator.
They've been lying in court about 2020 from the beginning. Too bad a judge wasn't smart enough to catch it this time.surprise, surprise, surprise
It Looks Like The FBI Straight Up Lied To A Judge To Get Permission To Seize Georgia Voting Records
Earlier this month, the FBI decided it was going to help Donald Trump steal back the election he’s claimed for half-a-decade was stolen from him. The state whose Secretary of State was asked …
it appears that the supreme court has struck down rump’s tariffs
Washington Post gift link
In rare rebuke of Trump, Supreme Court strikes down tariffs
The Supreme Court on Friday struck down most of President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs, a ruling that deals a major blow to his signature economic policy and represents a stinging political setback. The justices ruled the president did not have the authority under a 1977 emergency economic powers law to impose a vast array of import levies on goods from nearly all of the nation’s trading partners. The decision is expected to reverberate widely, affecting global trade, consumers, companies, inflation and the pocketbooks of every American.
In rare rebuke of Trump, Supreme Court strikes down tariffs
The Supreme Court on Friday struck down most of President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs, a ruling that deals a major blow to his signature economic policy and represents a stinging political setback. The justices ruled the president did not have the authority under a 1977 emergency economic powers law to impose a vast array of import levies on goods from nearly all of the nation’s trading partners. The decision is expected to reverberate widely, affecting global trade, consumers, companies, inflation and the pocketbooks of every American.
Trending content
Latest threads
-
-
Link: Dolphins to Release Tua. Taking a Record Hit on Salary Cap- Started by CB4
- Replies: 3
-
ESPN: 'The rules are a suggestion:' The ins and outs of tampering in college football- Started by TideFans Reporter
- Replies: 0
-
-
-