Why would the SEC consider adding Duke? We have our Vandy and given our academic situation being as good as it is; we certainly don't need another mediocre program with a stadium (regardless of who coached there) that holds 52,000 in the SEC!
We should go after Texas A&M and Clemson and simply be a 14 team league. It won't juggle things too much and frankly 16 team leagues will be very messy given the fact that you can't play more than 13 games in a year INCLUDING a league championship. Therefore you're almost faced with having to lose several schools for 4 year stretches and that's hard. I'm not sure how much better it would be going to 14! The PAC 10 seemingly wants to monopolize football outside of the SEC and they just don't have the horses to do it regardless of who they add (IMHO)!
Yes, you're wrong. The contract value will go up in proportion to expected new viewship if the conference expands. The contract already has a provision for renegotiation if more teams are added.Perhaps I am wrong, but our payouts are not based on ratings or markets. Maybe with bigger markets we could renegotiate, but that seems speculative unless there is already an escalator clause.
ESPN is reporting that Texas and Texas A&M are now in talks with the intent of both schools going together to the same conference. If this happens, it is looking more like PAC 10.It doesn't look like any of the ex-Big 12 schools are coming, but hopefully Coach Stallings can help out with aTm.
Posted via Mobile Device
I'm for these 2 teams... 2 new tv markets and 2 teams that can hold their own in most sports.If only 14 then go after A&M and Va Tech.