Re: Where did “throw out the record books” come from when talking about the Iron Bowl
It's completely understandable why Shula would have said that, too.
Prior to 1982 - the year before he came to UA - Alabama had beaten Auburn ten straight times.....going back to 1972 when Mike was 7 years old. HIS PERSONAL EXPERIENCE began with, "We beat Auburn." Then we lose in Bryant's last game, lose in Shula's first year (with Walter Lewis at QB), and then WIN a game we had no business being close and then win probably the biggest non-title moment in Alabama history on Tiffin's kick, where Shula led the drive.
Entering Shula's first Iron Bowl as coach, we had actually been 10-11 in the previous 21 meetings with Auburn, and he'd been there firsthand for TWO Alabama underdogs (84 and 85) to win and one (86) to lose.
So Shula saying that is at least understandable.
I don't understand most other quotes on this game at all. They're nonsense.
One more thing for those of you who have been Tide fans longer than some of us.
YES, there were games where Auburn "upset" us in that the favorite lost the game. And 1972 was two lightning bolts in a matter of minutes and yes, we SHOULD have won the game. But that's not really what's being said here. Auburn's wins in 1972, 2010, and 2013 in particular were VERY GOOD TEAMS beating very good Alabama teams. They weren't 0-11 Northwestern of the early 1980s stunning #1 Alabama.
THAT'S what's being said here. The unfortunate truth is that a number of Tide fans begin with the assumption, "Auburn isn't any good" and build their analysis and experience around that.
Some of us are beholden to data. I understand the emotion expended, but let's see:
1972 - a one-loss #9 Auburn team beats Alabama by one point.
By NO RATIONAL measurement is that some catastrophic event like us losing to ULM. Yes, the WAY it was done was something else, but it's simply not very shocking at all.
2013 - #4 Auburn beats #1 Alabama at home by six points.
Again - NOT shocking by any rational criteria. A painful loss and stunning in its execution?
Yes.
But not Chaminade beating UVA with Sampson, either.
It's completely understandable why Shula would have said that, too.
Prior to 1982 - the year before he came to UA - Alabama had beaten Auburn ten straight times.....going back to 1972 when Mike was 7 years old. HIS PERSONAL EXPERIENCE began with, "We beat Auburn." Then we lose in Bryant's last game, lose in Shula's first year (with Walter Lewis at QB), and then WIN a game we had no business being close and then win probably the biggest non-title moment in Alabama history on Tiffin's kick, where Shula led the drive.
Entering Shula's first Iron Bowl as coach, we had actually been 10-11 in the previous 21 meetings with Auburn, and he'd been there firsthand for TWO Alabama underdogs (84 and 85) to win and one (86) to lose.
So Shula saying that is at least understandable.
I don't understand most other quotes on this game at all. They're nonsense.
One more thing for those of you who have been Tide fans longer than some of us.
YES, there were games where Auburn "upset" us in that the favorite lost the game. And 1972 was two lightning bolts in a matter of minutes and yes, we SHOULD have won the game. But that's not really what's being said here. Auburn's wins in 1972, 2010, and 2013 in particular were VERY GOOD TEAMS beating very good Alabama teams. They weren't 0-11 Northwestern of the early 1980s stunning #1 Alabama.
THAT'S what's being said here. The unfortunate truth is that a number of Tide fans begin with the assumption, "Auburn isn't any good" and build their analysis and experience around that.
Some of us are beholden to data. I understand the emotion expended, but let's see:
1972 - a one-loss #9 Auburn team beats Alabama by one point.
By NO RATIONAL measurement is that some catastrophic event like us losing to ULM. Yes, the WAY it was done was something else, but it's simply not very shocking at all.
2013 - #4 Auburn beats #1 Alabama at home by six points.
Again - NOT shocking by any rational criteria. A painful loss and stunning in its execution?
Yes.
But not Chaminade beating UVA with Sampson, either.