If we look at the NFL a high percentage of Head Coaches have complex play sheets in their hands and they are tied to the OC in the booth calling plays. I would be looking for a very cerebral guy like Sark who is deeply involved in play calling. difficult to see anyone being successful in modern football in a CEO capacity.Sark gets the job, IMO.
and part of it is because of the system already being in place for a long time and part of it is also due to his experience in another part of it would be due to the fact he would not have lost a bunch of those guys that went to the portal.Yes. CNS would have done better but idk how much
Last season, Saban needed a miracle to beat Auburn, was one play away from being upset by Arkansas (4-8), held a touchdown lead over an AAC school in the 4th quarter and was embarrassed by Texas at home.Beat Vandy and Oklahoma for sure
First round bye in playoffs. We're most likely playing today with another legit shot at winning ANOTHER national championship
Yeah, you can pretty much throw out dedication and loyalty to a certain team. Now it's just $$$$$$ and "if I don't like it, or get enough cash, I'll just go somewhere else". How can any coach, even Saban and Kirby build and maintain a team. The only ones that can are the ones with a pile of cash to use.I think the most telling aspect of Saban‘stenure at Alabama is sustaining the dynasty. I don’t think people understand how difficult that truly was. Three in four had been done (in a different time) by Notre Dame in the 40s and Nebraska in the 90s, both cases a time when it was much easier to do that difficult accomplishment.
And Dabo came within a score in 15 or a better half in 19 from doing the same thing.
But look at Clemson now in an easier conference.
The greatest accomplishment Saban pulled at Alabama on the football field, was sustaining and reconstructing the Dynasty BEYOND what a normal dynasty entails in CFB. This regression is why so many people, and I will confess to being one myself, thought our Dynasty died that night against Ole Miss in 2015. It was simple math and what we had all watched happen previously. Remember, also that Alabama had a unique challenge that no other Dynasty had, the one team that won the championship in the years. Alabama didn’t out of those four just happened to be in the same small state and competing for the same pool of players.
Kirby is about to find out whether he can do it or not, and he has even more unique challenges than Saban had.
Saban was always looking for a problem to fix. He actually didn't like it when it looked like nothing was wrong, because he understood there was always something wrong, it was just a matter of whether or not he could get other people to see the need to address it.IOW Saban was always more critical of our play in games like that during postgame PC's than DeBoer was and maybe if that lack of criticism carried over into practice it would explain why we had some poor results against some weaker teams. Just my theory.
I find it weird that you think that even slightly makes the case that Saban would have lost to Vandy this season, with these players.I still find it weird that everyone wants to say Saban would have never lost to a team like Vanderbilt but yet his first year in the SEC he lost to UAB 13-10.
I find it weird that you think that even slightly makes the case that Saban would have lost to Vandy this season, with these players.
This is a serious problem, although I think we oversell the alleged “loyalty” of folks in the past who didn’t have the same opportunity. If modern pay for play and portal would’ve existed during the Great Depression (when Bryant was on campus) or even during that great run we had in the early 90s, how many players would we have been able to hold onto? Worse, how far more crippling would a probation with no bowls have been in that setup?Yeah, you can pretty much throw out dedication and loyalty to a certain team. Now it's just $$$$$$ and "if I don't like it, or get enough cash, I'll just go somewhere else". How can any coach, even Saban and Kirby build and maintain a team. The only ones that can are the ones with a pile of cash to use.
One team went 3-8 the season beforeI still find it weird that everyone wants to say Saban would have never lost to a team like Vanderbilt but yet his first year in the SEC he lost to UAB 13-10.
Yeah and one is UAB under strict limitations and the other is a Vandy squad under no limitations.One team went 3-8 the season before
The other was 12-2 with sec championship
I was referring to how things looked different post 2020 when CNS was still the coach. Less discipline, more penalties, less attention to details....they were there when CNS was still the coach.The answer is right there in what you said but you seem to be overlooking the why. Why would things suddenly look difference when there's a new head coach. Why might that be the case?
Don't you remember the midseason thing where there was suddenly a push to get players to tuck in their pants and show up to meetings on time? This means no one was bothering to make them do that prior!
As far as attention to those details, I know it because I witnessed the lack of attention. I've alluded to some examples. Sending the wrong player onto the field, entirely on coaching, which cost the Vanderbilt game. Wearing the wrong cleats, which blew up a couple drives and probably cost the Michigan game. Those are all details that were overlooked...
Furthermore, I've cited the games against inferior competition DeBoer has lost the past few years, not just 3-9 Arizona St. (with Penix mind you), but also Hawaii and Oklahoma. This is a problem he has, and you don't lose to a team that's way worse than your team if you handle all the small stuff correctly. There's a reason Saban went over a decade without having that sort of a loss.
With these players? Don't forget,) that last season, Saban had "these players" plus the added luxury of Downs, Amos, Niblack, Latham, Key Eboigbe, Turner, Arnold, Kool-Aid, etc. and was one play away from losing to two significantly worse teams than this year's Vandy.I find it weird that you think that even slightly makes the case that Saban would have lost to Vandy this season, with these players.
This is maybe the worst take I have seenI still find it weird that everyone wants to say Saban would have never lost to a team like Vanderbilt but yet his first year in the SEC he lost to UAB 13-10.
Yes, kinda the point of the thread. And "with these players" CNS is hamstringed a bit compared to his normal "superior talent."With these players? Don't forget,) that last season, Saban had "these players" plus the added luxury of Downs, Amos, Niblack, Latham, Key Eboigbe, Turner, Arnold, Kool-Aid, etc. and was one play away from losing to two significantly worse teams than this year's Vandy.