JBama_in_PCOLA
TideFans Legend
Re: Johnny Manziel investigated by NCAA
Exactly...
If by fry, you mean pay it back and play the 2013 season.
Exactly...
If by fry, you mean pay it back and play the 2013 season.
How much do you think we can get the REC to pay this guy for the video? Heck we could get contribution from the other fanbases on A&M's schedule this year lol.
Since when? If you're applying Cam Newton rules, sure... but if you're applying the rules they used when hammering several other schools, they certainly don't have to prove anything.The problem is they still have no proof of payment. They can have all the video they want of him signing items but they have to prove he received money.
On the videos, which the broker said were recorded without Manziel's knowledge, ESPN heard Manziel say "you never did a signing with me" and that if the broker were to tell anyone, he would refuse to deal with him again in the future. Manziel, who appeared comfortable throughout the video recordings, also said if asked, he would say he had simply been approached by various autograph seekers.
Ten bucks says this post shows up on ITAT in the next five minutes![]()
Ol Johnny knows how the game goes. He is smarter than the Ohio State gang from tattoo-gate.
Can somebody who knows the rules clear this up? I thought that was only for incidental benefits of marginal value.
This still just seems like a lot of hot air. Without money changing hands, and proof thereof, I don't see anything happening to him.
Nothing may happen to JM's playing status, but now everyone knows he's guilty and he knew what he was doing. His hands are dirty.
Can somebody who knows the rules clear this up? I thought that was only for incidental benefits of marginal value.
Maybe he'll get suspended for 24 hours...
The NCAA has never explicitly required definitive proof of monetary transfers -- in fact they've almost never required it before doling out punishment -- and as voluminous as the circumstantial evidence is here I tend to doubt they will require it in this case.
I believe Dareus was pretty up front with the NCAA along with Bama's compliance department doing everything it possibly could to take care of the situation.http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=5585220
AJ Green's case was over 1000 dollars. Had to repay to charity and suspended for 4 games.
http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2010/09/tides_dareus_will_serve_a_two-.html
Dareus's case was over 1700 dollars and change, and he had to repay and missed 2 games. I can't remember why the variance in games missed.
You are correct. Look at recent cases involving AJ Green and our own Marcel Dareus. They had to pay back the money AND they missed games. Green missed 4; seems like Dareus missed 2.
This still just seems like a lot of hot air. Without money changing hands, and proof thereof, I don't see anything happening to him.
ESPN has acknowledged the tapes exist; If somebody like TMZ buys them, that could be enough. NCAA isn't a court of law, they just need enough to make a determination that he violated the rules.
This is also in addition to the alleged signings mentioned in the recent article.