I have no skin in this game - what happens with FSU has no bearing on OSU's BCSCG hopes. Here's what we now know:
Meggs said that she did not know him - so that is a fact. Better than 98% of rape cases reported in which the victim does not know the attacker are legit, so this is HUGE and almost impossible to overcome.
She had sex with her boyfriend that evening before she went out and was raped - not a stranger. Not sure what that makes her, as she never lied to the police about it, she just refused to volunteer his name. So the second set of DNA is meaningless in this case, but Meggs made it out to be some sort of a problem for him in prosecution. No idea why.
She was drinking, but she was not absurdly drunk and they found no other drugs in her system. What conclusions do we draw from that? Part of her story was that she was too drunk to remember where is apartment was. Not hard to believe if she was just raped her memory might have been effected, even if she was not totally drunk. Meggs turned this into another problem with prosecution. He was blaming her for her poor memory, and saw no reason for it (his words). How about being raped?
Finally, Meggs said that there were no inconsistencies in the girl's story - just memory lapses. Anyone who has performed any sort of investigation understands that liars are easily caught by their story inconsistencies. Her story remained the same, even when retelling it 11 months later. That is pretty damning, too.
I do not see how anyone could see all of this and choose not to put this in front of a jury. I feel horrible for this girl. As of right now, given the information available, as far as I am concerned Winston is a rapist.