Hamas attacks Israel - Part 2

Those things you write are why when an election does happen he will most likely be out, but there is a unity government and war cabinet in place. All major parties are represented in the cabinet and he isn’t making all the decisions himself. That’s not how this works. His major rival has he same policy in Gaza as him and anyone that doesn’t want to get Hamas won’t be prime minister.
 
fwiw

He wants to be prime minister and probably will be.

Will he back off this pledge? Because if he does he’ll be prime minister for about five minutes. I haven’t seen him say anything else.

 
Netanyahu has crapped the bed, or in other words soured relations with the U.S...new leadership would do wonders for refreshing American's waning support of Israel.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 92tide
Netanyahu has crapped the bed, or in other words soured relations with the U.S...new leadership would do wonders for refreshing American's waning support of Israel.
I highly doubt it. The anti-war left and the anti-war MAGA don't give a damn who the PM is. The anti-war libertarians seem pretty solid in their collective view as well. I haven't seen much "waning support" from the establishment Dems/Reps, but maybe I missed something.
 
I highly doubt it. The anti-war left and the anti-war MAGA don't give a damn who the PM is. The anti-war libertarians seem pretty solid in their collective view as well. I haven't seen much "waning support" from the establishment Dems/Reps, but maybe I missed something.
Israel has been waiting for six months for Congress to approve more aid…and they still won’t do it, that seems like a good example of the waning.

There was a time not too long ago that the U.S. would have sent the help without hesitation. Now it’s like squeezing blood from a turnip.
 
Israel has been waiting for six months for Congress to approve more aid…and they still won’t do it, that seems like a good example of the waning.
It's a fair point, but I'm reasonably certain single-item legislation would get through much, much more easily than they are making it look. Multi-item bills will always have some unpopular legislation attached to it that will always complicate things.
 
It's a fair point, but I'm reasonably certain single-item legislation would get through much, much more easily than they are making it look. Multi-item bills will always have some unpopular legislation attached to it that will always complicate things.
Of course single item legislation would pass much more easily, that’s why Mitch insisted that the issue be combined with several other volatile situations. The delay is deliberate, and is on him.

if I remember correctly, Mitch was the one who first came up with the condition that four different situations be addressed in a single piece of legislation. It did pass in the Senate but has bogged down in the House.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: CrimsonJazz
fwiw


Israel promised it will open new humanitarian aid routes into Gaza on Thursday, immediately after its most important international ally appeared to threaten it with an ultimatum.

The United States welcomed news that a border crossing into northern Gaza and an Israeli port will both be used to deliver food and aid for the first time since the Mideast conflict erupted last fall.

Israel agreed to reopen the Erez land crossing and use the Ashohod port after receiving an unprecedented threat from U.S. President Joe Biden.
 
Peter Zeihan has an interesting take on the Iranian attack on Israel. I'd link it, but there's a single distinctly non-TideFans word in the middle. If you'd like to see the video, it's easy to find on YouTube,. The title is, "Iran Launched an Attack on Israel (Sort Of)."

Zeihan says that the genesis of the attack was a few weeks ago when Israel took out a couple of para-military commanders in Syria. Iran doesn't truly care all that incredibly much but would prefer not to lose sympathetic leaders outside its own borders. More than that, it doesn't want to be seen as weak and thereby lose face.

So this attack was claimed to be in retaliation for the commanders' assassination. Thing is, they telegraphed the number, nature and launch points of all the missiles, drones, etc. for several days before launching. Because the US doesn't have diplomatic ties with Iran, the heads-up was communicated to the Swiss Embassy, and on through the Swiss to the US and Israel.

Point being Israel knew exactly what to expect and when to expect it. So the claimed 99% rate at which the weapons were shot down might be accurate, but it was a lot easier to achieve than it would have been if the attack were truly a surprise.

IOW, Iran didn't want to cause damage that might really irritate the Israelis, especially given their ongoing entanglement with Hamas.

I don't know if Zeihan is right on his assessment, but it's an interesting possibility.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Go Bama

UN has cut the number of women and children killed in Gaza in half. Imagine that, we can’t trust Hamas to tell the truth. I’m shocked.


From the linked article:
"almost 50% less women and children killed than previously reported"

"the organization, which admits to relying on figures from the Hamas-run Ministry of Health in Gaza"

So much for the United Nations being some kind of beacon of truth....... :rolleyes:
 
If Hamas surrendered, came out, dropped their weapons, and stood trial for their crimes, it would all end tomorrow.
No more violence, no hunger, rebuilding could start, the Palestinians could have an actual chance to vote honestly for leadership not bent on killing Jews.
The only thing preventing a lasting and just peace from breaking out is Hamas surrendering.
 

New Posts

Advertisement

Trending content

Advertisement

Latest threads