That probably should have happened immediately after CKD was hired. CKD could not control whether other teams would guarantee him a starting position, but he could guarantee a serious competition for the starting job at Alabama. You control the things you can control.
Machiavelli said, "If you are going to be a hard-butt, do that early, because if you go soft early and then try to tighten up discipline later, folks will revolt." (paraphrasing).
Same goes for coaching (and maybe leadership in general). Be tough and demanding early on, then, once the leader and the organization get to know each others' expectations and system, lighten up a bit.
Having a dip in performance first year will be more easily forgiven than in year three. Coach Saban started 7-6 at Alabama first year. I am not suggesting that CKD going 7-6 with this roster would have been okay, but 9-4, having cleared out all the dead wood right off the bat would have been better than hanging onto the deadwood all year, tolerating sub-par performance, and (worst of all) teaching players that they run the program, means that tightening up next year with another dip in performance will be less well-received in 2025 than it was in 2024.
Now, the 2025 team had better be impressive in 2025 and even more so in 2026 or the stay of the DeBoer family in Tuscaloosa may be brief.