Game Thread: CFP Semi #1 | LSU vs OU (4p ET | ESPN)

[bamacon]

Haven't seen targeting all bowl season

 

[B1GTide]

#44 has to be gone. That is exactly the type of play that the targeting rule was implemented to end.

 

[BAMAVILLE]

Wierd they reviewed that

 

[TideEngineer08]

Holy cow! The QB is right in front of you and you choose to target the RB who is no longer even an eligible receiver?

Stupid!

 

[bamacon]

Anyone pick 84-28 in the score prediction thread?

 

[Krymsonman]

Blind side targeting?

Very possible there. Maybe he's just seen enough and wants out of the game.

 

[Bazza]

Haven't seen targeting all bowl season

Only the second SEC game played - give it time......

 

[bamacon]

Another missed call on the field

 

[78Alum]

Well of course it was targeting. If that wasn't targeting what is?

 

[Evil Crimson Dragon]

He should have been more concerned with getting Burrow

 

[crimsonaudio]

Holy cow! The QB is right in front of you and you choose to target the RB who is no longer even an eligible receiver?

Stupid!

Awesome coaching.

 

[OSUTideFan]

Another missed call on the field

 

[teamplayer]

That is the type of play that should be targeting. He left his feet and drove through the guys facemask. The player had a choice in the situation, and it was a cheap shot. That is the type of play that is easy to get rid of. Most plays they call targeting are full of crap because the defensive player does everything right and still gets called.

 

[russtang]

Easiest targeting call all year. Stupid play by 44

 

[BAMAVILLE]

That was just stupid ... can't put your team in a compromised position like that

 

[bamacon]

Shouldn't they have gotten an additional 15 yards?

 

[OSUTideFan]

They threw the book at OU for that shot

 

[Tide&True]

LSU is clearly better than OU. The bad ref calls just expedited the matter.

 

[bamacon]

That should have been a PICK6

 

[jthomas666]

LSU didn't have enough men on the line.