Yeah, thankfully Danielson doesn't have much influence in these matters. I think that's part of his problem, he knows his voice doesn't carry much weight.
Most every honest media member realizes that there is no team except Alabama that can challenge and beat LSU. And by the way, I'm getting tired of hearing that this is some sort of loophole created by the BCS. This has nothing to do with the BCS. Under any possible system out there, Alabama would be alive for the national championship. Under the old system, LSU would be going to the Sugar Bowl, and Alabama would likely be going to the Orange or Fiesta. Or the Sugar Bowl could even have elected to put Alabama against LSU in a rematch. Alabama would still be ranked #2 right now, without the BCS. The Sugar Bowl did this before, back in 1994 and 1996, putting Florida and Florida State against one another in rematches.
Or say we did have a playoff. Make it a 4 team, 8 team, or even 16 team playoff. Alabama would be in, and they'd be odds on favorites to make it to the championship game unless they were in LSU's side of the bracket. In either case we'd have, what? A rematch. This notion that this is a bad thing that the BCS has created is absurd. These are the two best teams in the country, by far, and they were going to have to go through one another more than once to win the championship, under any system.