So far, the real difference in 'AI' from the 60s to today is processing speed and online storage.That's like comparing automobiles in the 1920's to automobiles in the 2020's.
So far, the real difference in 'AI' from the 60s to today is processing speed and online storage.That's like comparing automobiles in the 1920's to automobiles in the 2020's.
I don't even know what to say.So far, the real difference in 'AI' from the 60s to today is processing speed and online storage.
My point is that real AI is all about the software. Todays AI is just built on brute force computing and massive online storage using software that is not all that different from the 60s. A good example was IBM's Watson that took on and crushed Jeopardy champions. Just a lot of very fast lookups and retreiveals. In the end, I guess that so far, 'AI' is all in the semantics. Call it what you want but its mostly marketing so far. If you would like a pop culture of what I consider AI, just look at HAL. We are nowhere near that and probably will never obtain that with digital computing. Quantam computing may be the next step.I don't even know what to say.
It certainly seems as if you've dug your heels in on this one, despite the fact that everyone I know in tech is worried, surprised (or both) by the enormous increase in ability.
Either you've got a 50k' view very few others do or you've got blinders on.
I don't know how deeply you've looked into what's happening in machine learning, but real Ai (like HAL) is likely a lot closer to reality than you might think. There's already some question as to whether some of these software systems are sentient.If you would like a pop culture of what I consider AI, just look at HAL. We are nowhere near that and probably will never obtain that with digital computing. Quantam computing may be the next step.
It was your I may live in the dumbest state comment that prompted the legislature to finally do something everyone agrees with. /sNicely done, Tennessee.
![]()
Tennessee just became the first state to protect musicians and other artists against AI
Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee has signed off on legislation designed to protect songwriters, performers and other music industry professionals against the potential dangers of artificial intelligenceabcnews.go.com
Not totally AI, but it will likely be incorporated at the upper levels of decision-making before long.
An example of the effect on workers and the reason: projected 11% profit increase by 2026.
![]()
UPS plans to close around 200 US facilities, shift volume to automated hubs
The company is consolidating locations as part of its "Network of the Future" initiative, which aims to reduce its labor needs and save $3 billion by 2028.www.supplychaindive.com
Exactly--"AI" is basically computers leveraging massive amounts of data. They can do a lot of work, but still can't replace humans (my new job is with cybersecurity AI). We're still nowhere near having a system pass the Turing test.This is nothing new. What we now call AI has been around in some form or another since the 60s, computer driven automation. The programs are just getting more sophisticated. As far as I know, computers still dont think for themselves yet. They still follow a set of instructions written by humans. When true AI hits, watch out.
Think they pass a bill if they weren’t literally within walking distance of Music Row?It was your I may live in the dumbest state comment that prompted the legislature to finally do something everyone agrees with. /s
BYW, I tried Belltower Coffee. Really good food and I loved the atmosphere. Big thank you!
I can manage with a flip phone and a Rand McNally map.I'm hoping someone will develop a smart phone that eschews OpenAI - I've had an iPhone since the day they released in 2007 and am pretty deeply embedded in that environment but don't really want everything I do being shared with OpenAI.
View attachment 42938