If he were one of outs I'd Stoll have trouble with the way out was handled and want it to go to trial.
Sent from my Droid using Tapatalk
Sent from my Droid using Tapatalk
I can't help but wonder if the DA had graduated from any other college would there still be no case.
I've read enough of the documents to have a good feeling the girl was raped.All I have to say is, if y'all can assume he did rape the girl, I can assume that he didn't, and I believe he didn't. Girls can lie ya know. I'd be interested to see the comments if it was one of ours. I absolutely respect everyone's opinion in this thread though.![]()
I've read enough of the documents to have a good feeling the girl was raped.
Here's a piece from Deadspin about why we should believe the victim. Read it.
For those that missed his postgame interview Saturday night, watch it below.
Now, see the reaction from his attorney.
Ok I am curious for all the legal eagles on here. Can the victim make a federal case of this? Like try to get the DA disbarred? This whole thing reeks of corruption.
I am by no means a legal guru. But I don't understand how the state can tell a victim to shove off when the victim has been trying to get a rape charge for nearly a year. Its not like there is no evidence. Why not bring it to trial? How is the victim supposed to get closure? I guess I don't exactly get why the State gets to decide to press charges or not, and not the victim.
When this story first came out, I had my doubts. I thought it might possibly be a case of "get the famous guy". But that is clearly not the case. It needs to go to trial.
It seems that every time we have a case where a woman accuses a high-profile athlete of rape, we get the inevitable "we just couldn't prove it" press conference. Where are the prosecutors who say, "I believe my witness, we're moving forward, and we'll let the jury decide who's telling the truth"? THAT's what prosecutors are supposed to do. Seek justice, not just winnable cases. In the event law enforcement hadn't noticed: Many woman get raped when they're drinking. Many rape victims are not virgins walking home from church. Some of us foolishly put ourselves in situations that we should not have. But the penalty for stupidity is not rape.
Frankly, I've represented clients charged with sexual assault on less evidence than Meggs had against Winston. Significantly less, actually. My clients, usually poor minority men with no shot at the Heisman, were never given the option of "declining" to be interviewed by the police. Meggs may not have been pressured to close the case against Winston, but given the knee-slappin' good time and Meggs's palpable relief at the press conference, it's hard to imagine that Meggs wasn't at least partly influenced by the public flogging he took from FSU fans and alums when he charged defensive tackle Travis Johnson with rape in 2003, and lost.
I don't know what happened between Jameis Winston and his accuser. Given what I've read in the police reports and the fact that the victim was clearly frightened, at least initially, of pressing charges against Winston, I'm inclined to believe her. I also know that, after a woman is raped, the prospects of a police interrogation and cross-examination are frightening. So frightening in fact, that many of us choose to keep quiet.
I know that every time we see one of these "we can't prove it" press conferences, it confirms what many rape victims have grown to believe: Unless there are severe injuries and/or witnesses to the rape, it's not even worth reporting it.
In fact, for any woman who watched Willie Meggs chortle his way through last week's press conference, the message was clear: When accusing someone of rape, bruises aren't enough. Blood in your underwear isn't enough. The rapist's DNA isn't enough. Your testimony isn't enough.