I've always worked on the assumption that there were Bolsheviks among the red army and that the Bolsheviks at least cared about their own during the revolution. Until Stalin and then it went back to what it always was. Interesting that even this was wrongIt is cute you make that exception.
The Bolsheviks told the Russian army "get out of the trenches and fraternize with the enemy." The idea was that this would be the best way to spread the revolution.
The Bolsheviks, however, issued this order, not because they wanted to save the lives of Russian soldiers, but to advance the dialectic. The individuals meant less than nothing to them. Their value lay in how they advanced the dialectic. If advancing the dialectic meant you had to stop a war, so be it. If it meant you had to murder a few million individuals, that is good as well.
To your larger point, for as long as there has been a Russia, Russia has always been lavish in the blood of its soldiers.
The juxtaposed imagery of artistry amid horror is…both beautiful…and haunting…simultaneously.
At some point, a line needs to be drawn. And I think it is wise to do it now.Question, is all this really worth dragging the entire planet into a nuclear war? The planet is already struggling because of the pandemic. Lower and middle classes every where are struggling with higher cost for basic goods. A world nuclear war will just devastate everyone but the elite 1% (because they always seem to come out on top).
I honestly think all this support for Ukraine is just a front. I think most countries would let Russia have the country if it means avoiding a nuclear war. Maybe, ultimately, it is inevitable but, I will not sit here and cheer any US leader on for getting us involved in WWIII.
Question, is all this really worth dragging the entire planet into a nuclear war? The planet is already struggling because of the pandemic. Lower and middle classes every where are struggling with higher cost for basic goods. A world nuclear war will just devastate everyone but the elite 1% (because they always seem to come out on top).
I honestly think all this support for Ukraine is just a front. I think most countries would let Russia have the country if it means avoiding a nuclear war. Maybe, ultimately, it is inevitable but, I will not sit here and cheer any US leader on for getting us involved in WWIII.
Unless the Russians took the Baltics, those troops in Kalingrad can’t be supplied to wage war. Right now it’s only by sea. Even if they took the Baltics, I don’t know how well they could be supplied, given the Russian logistics performance in UkraineAt some point, a line needs to be drawn. And I think it is wise to do it now.
Putin has acted with impunity up to now, and he has been very clear as to what his goals are for Russia's future: the return of the Soviet republics to Russia's domination.
There are currently 200K Russian troops in Kalininigrad, a Russian oblast that should never have existed after WW2(it's between Poland and Lithuania). Which would be a springboard for a Russian advance into the Baltics.
I have no doubt that the previous administration would have green-lighted the Ukraine invasion. For Trump was an unabashed Russian asset. And he had willing useful idiots in the Republican Party who would have had his back.
Are we sure he was killed by his own troops? My gut tells me an Asian female driver was involved.*
"It's better to be a deserter than fertilizer"New York Times does a really good job of piecing together captured radio audio with troop movements etc.
Warning this is war footage so there is a little language and of course some shocking images
Alabama Crimson Tide Car Door Light
Get this and many more items at our TideFans.shop!
Purchases may result in a commission being paid to TideFans.