Damn, he almost sounds libertarian. But in the sense of what libertarians used to be. Not the current veiled authoritarians.
Damn, he almost sounds libertarian. But in the sense of what libertarians used to be. Not the current veiled authoritarians.
i figured folks would be happy to see one of our nation’s elite lose so spectacularly to an upstartDamn, he almost sounds libertarian. But in the sense of what libertarians used to be. Not the current veiled authoritarians.
Well - to be fair - look at who the other primary opponent was, which might suggest how serious any Democratic "metoo" on sexual harassment/assault/etc is had he won.
I see no flaws in this plan.
This is best they can do?Well - to be fair - look at who the other primary opponent was, which might suggest how serious any Democratic "metoo" on sexual harassment/assault/etc is had he won.
Government owned grocery stores. Do people not understand that grocery stores have the lowest margins of any retailer class? Even if they were able to sell everything at cost it would only save shoppers between 1 and 5 cents on every dollar. The only way to really save people money would be to subsidize the stores and sell for substantially less than cost. Now you have a madhouse where everyone is trying to shop in one of the government stores and the more you sell the more you have to take from the taxpayers to cover the shortfall. Only an economic illiterate would think this is a good idea.I see no flaws in this plan.
You spelled Democrat wrong.Only an economic illiterate would think this is a good idea.
Exactly.This is best they can do?
Do you think Republicans are any better?You spelled Democrat wrong.
Honestly, no. Ergo, the blue font.Do you think Republicans are any better?
Libertarians philosophically will overlap some with the left and some with the right. Decriminalizing personal drug use would be one of those areas. But, in most everything else, there is no agreement between libertarians and a socialist clown like Mamdani.Damn, he almost sounds libertarian. But in the sense of what libertarians used to be. Not the current veiled authoritarians.
Interesting. I understand economics very well, but I'm not sure what unicorn economics is. If it is snark for fantasy, maybe it better applies to those who want a big government to take care of everyone (in the most inefficient and dumbest way possible, which means in the end it doesn't take care of people) while also playing the economic jealously card and falsely claiming that higher taxes on businesses and the rich will be a net gain to this scheme.Ah, yes. The bugbear of the folks from unicorn economics and living in their parents' basement. Erstwhile known as libertarians.![]()
I'm not a Republican, much less one from 75 years ago. But, in sum, I'll add that socialism does not advance individuals or society. Social Security is a terribly implemented plan, depriving most everyone of retiring extremely comfortably. I'm not for subsidies, much less farm subsides. I don't have an issue with deposit insurance. Unions - who all too often defend bad cops, horrible teachers, and lazy workers, while giving them overmarket pay and benefits - are generally not something to be championed. Competitive markets, fostering consumer and worker choice, is much, much better. And FDR is someone to be revered? The same FDR who prolonged the depression, tried to pack the courts, and is guilty sending 120,000 Japanese-American to internment camps? What a guy!Give 'em Hell, Harry Truman:
Socialism is a scare word they have hurled at every advance the people have made in the last 20 years.
Socialism is what they called public power. Socialism is what they called social security.
Socialism is what they called farm price supports.
Socialism is what they called bank deposit insurance.
Socialism is what they called the growth of free and independent labor organizations.
Socialism is their name for almost anything that helps all the people.
When the Republican candidate inscribes the slogan "Down With Socialism" on the banner of his "great crusade," that is really not what he means at all.
What he really means is "Down with Progress--down with Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal," and "down with Harry Truman's fair Deal." That's all he means.
I went thru the entire interview, and it seemed like Rogan and Bernie were in agreement about everything else. Yet the person who posted this minute and half clip seemed to want to make it look like Rogan had made mincemeat out of him.It’s not every day a major politician sits down with Joe Rogan.
Bernie Sanders did, and now we know why most skip the invitation.
Bernie pushed the global warming narrative. Rogan crushed him with undeniable data.
Then it got worse.
Rogan made Sanders instantly regret saying we should tax the rich more—because Rogan immediately asked why we’d give more money to a corrupt government.
Then, Rogan questioned the government’s monopoly on power, which left Sanders scrambling.
Watch it all unfold.
I listen to Rogan a lot and definitely want to hear the whole interview. For some reason, employers don't like when their people are listening to podcasts instead of working, so I will have to pick a time.I went thru the entire interview, and it seemed like Rogan and Bernie were in agreement about everything else. Yet the person who posted this minute and half clip seemed to want to make it look like Rogan had made mincemeat out of him.
I say this because I am on record here of NOT being a fan of either individual. But it just highlights how people with axes to grind will find ways to grind the ax.
The simple fact nobody in the Democratic Party will come right out and run on that at a national level except Bernie Sanders (a two-time loser) tells you right there all you need to know about how well this strategy will work.Ah, yes. The bugbear of the folks from unicorn economics and living in their parents' basement. Erstwhile known as libertarians.
Give 'em Hell, Harry Truman:
Socialism is a scare word they have hurled at every advance the people have made in the last 20 years.
Socialism is what they called public power. Socialism is what they called social security.
Socialism is what they called farm price supports.
Socialism is what they called bank deposit insurance.
Socialism is what they called the growth of free and independent labor organizations.
Socialism is their name for almost anything that helps all the people.
When the Republican candidate inscribes the slogan "Down With Socialism" on the banner of his "great crusade," that is really not what he means at all.
What he really means is "Down with Progress--down with Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal," and "down with Harry Truman's fair Deal." That's all he means.
Alabama Crimson Tide Car Door Light
Get this and many more items at our TideFans.shop!
Purchases may result in a commission being paid to TideFans.