Even if they can't afford it? (not sure if they can or not, just asking)... I know Utah has as well but , it's time to press the issue across the country even if they sign bad 2 for 1 deals and lose cash .
Huh? :conf2:Until utah joins the Pac-10 or Big 12, they will never be a BCS school. That's a fact.
The reason that I used 35th is because that is Bama's SoS this year after last night's game. Utah ended the season at #32.What... it would be ludicris to have a top 40 schedule and try to go undefeated. It can't happen and shouldn't be required.![]()
When will those Mountain Apes get it through their thick heads. The utes need to get a clue. I can only say if Utah were Number #1 in reality and the Tide #2 the outcome would have been much different. The players did not want Sugar they wanted Gold and missed out. Sad they felt that way but its the truth.No! They are not the champs. The Gators are...
If Utah played an SEC schedule, they would not be 12-0. JMHO
I wasn't addressing you. Is that ok? I was alluding to the ute's desire for a NC. It will never happen as long as they're not in a BCS conference. Why is that hard to understand?Huh? :conf2:
A good post, but think it through. The MNC game is a popularity contest. It isn't won by having a history of playing the best. If it was, we would have won the MNC in 1966 (or a few other times). We had just won back to back MNCs in '64 and '65 and were still not worthy. We lost the popularity contest.Tokolosh, I just want to congradulate your team on their success.
I also want to commend you for your taking the high road in this discussion.
A long time ago, we had the same type controversy. It was not the only reason, but an a good excuse for the powers that be to hide the real reasons, to exclude us in the National Championship in 1966 because our playing a schedule that was somewhat light out of conference games. So, I for one feel your pain.
I suspect that in these days and times, you have to grow in the pecking order and establish yourselves over the years. I think the Utes are on their way of doing that, so be patient. Keep doing the things your doing so that you can prove to the nation that Utah is not an anomaly, and it will happen.
Actually, I was referring to the Buddy Teevens era. Around the mid to late 80's and early 90's. There had been behind the door meetings about Tulane coming back into the SEC. They thought by going ahead and scheduling a lot of SEC teams that they would help their cause. The interest just wasn't strong enough from the SEC.This probably just slipped your mindTulane was a member of the SEC up to 1966 when they and Ga. Tech. quit the conference.
This is an internet forum. Use a PM if you have a personal message or you should expect open participation. That is the way internet forums work.I wasn't addressing you. Is that ok?
That is not what you said in your post. Read it again. I simply did not understand what you were trying to say. Try not to get so touchy...I was alluding to the ute's desire for a NC. It will never happen as long as they're not in a BCS conference. Why is that hard to understand?
I thought you were giving up.The reason that I used 35th is because that is Bama's SoS this year after last night's game. Utah ended the season at #32.
No one would question whether or not Bama would deserve to be #1 this year if we were undefeated...
LOL - I did too. I really should...I thought you were giving up.
Did you not read the part when I stated that there were others reasons involved that most likely left us without a championship?A good post, but think it through. The MNC game is a popularity contest. It isn't won by having a history of playing the best. If it was, we would have won the MNC in 1966 (or a few other times). We had just won back to back MNCs in '64 and '65 and were still not worthy. We lost the popularity contest.
Utah is forced to hope that some day they are seen as "worthy", and a tougher schedule will not be enough if the media has to choose between them and a more popular team at the time...
Well, I'm going home, but I'll leave you with two thoughts.LOL - I did too. I really should...
I agree. I guess that I am just disgusted with the notion that MNCs are popularity contests and that so many are just fine with that. I am not defending Utah as much as I am trying to make people see the absurdity of it. Team A can win a MNC with a SoS of X, but Team B cannot, even with a better SoS just because they are not popular enough. Absurd....I agree that todays polling is a popularity contest. I am merely stating that if they keep doing the things they are doing, they will become popular. Beating the Crimson Tide was a step in the right direction for the Utes...
Wayne is an artsy town. Lots of Italians.Is your wife Italian?By the way, my girlfriend is from Wayne, New Jersey. She is pretty feisty!!
Up till the time Tulane left they also had more SEC titles than AuburnSpeaking of the old Tulane-Ga Tech days in the SEC, I believe Tech still has more SEC Titles than Auburn.
:rofl: I didn't know that...Up till the time Tulane left they also had more SEC titles than Auburn![]()
I'd think they would be doing rather well these days . Basketball has been good to Utah as well . Don't know though :conf3:Even if they can't afford it? (not sure if they can or not, just asking)
Yep but , it's after the fact - too little , too late and becoming popular isn't good enough at this time and won't be in the immediate future either . Something similar during back to back regular seasons or 3 years out of 4 would make a huge difference for their program though . It's the only way in which I could see Utah reaching the next level - national credibility and respect with eventual entry into a BCS conference along with what comes with it - a legitimate chance at playing for a BCS title . I think they'd be a hell of a lot better in football and basketball for a conference like the B12 than say .... Baylor . JOMOI am merely stating that if they keep doing the things they are doing, they will become popular. Beating the Crimson Tide was a step in the right direction for the Utes.