I think we tend to forget the college model of football has made a lot of kids a lot of money over the years as well, on top of providing them with resources for an opportunity to earn an education. The players and the college platform both need each other. Take away the college platform and what would the players have had this entire time? More than likely an underfunded "pro" and "semi-pro" league with nowhere near the quality of coaching and benefits they have received from the college platform. Nick Saban's name and coaching knowledge have gotten kids drafted who otherwise would be working the drive-thru at Wendy's or a parts delivery driver for Auto Zone making $13/hour.I know Saban cares about the game but I wish he would not lend his NIL to this mess. There is no upside for him. He made multi-generational wealth off the game when the labor inputs were free. He dominated the sport because he was the ultimate agent to the NFL. I know he supports players receiving money, he can't oppose it because he has benefitted immense from the old model.
Ultimately, 2 models will have to develop where they player can opt-in to the NIL model of their choosing subject to certain restrictions.
The format needs to be fixed no doubt, but the players need college football just as much as college football needs them, but when it comes to the money part of the talks, the terminology should change to "value", because this narrative (not saying you're saying this) of coaches and admins making all the money and the kids "getting nothing" is not true. There are former LSU football and baseball players who live in my town that have gotten six-figure jobs not because they were the most qualified, but because they wore the LSU uniform. They weren't superstars but played four years at LSU in baseball or football and because of that, got a fast pass to the front of the line in the business world. Players get A LOT.