Winning a title with him as QB would give me LSD-like highs. I can't even imagine what that moment would feel like.
He would probably immediately get a statue by or somewhere near his great grandfather.
Winning a title with him as QB would give me LSD-like highs. I can't even imagine what that moment would feel like.
And, how much did it help his development to sit and watch all year, as opposed to the baptism by fire that Jalen received?Here's another wildcard that is next to impossible to measure or predict. The degree of development of other players from last season to this season. Could it be that Mac has gotten bigger and stronger in the offseason as well as had a lot of what he learned last season start to "click"? Resulting in a big developmental leap to where he's no longer an after thought when talking about the quarterback rotation?
The problem with that is Hurts pass attempts were way, way down under Daboll. He only attempted 254 passes (over 100 less than the year before) and Alabama was fairly run heavy. He actually ran the ball less as well, which was still a considerable 154 times.
The issue is that if Tua is the kind of passer he looks like he'll be, he's not just going to be handing off the whole time. To give an example, in his senior season, AJ passed the ball 336 times and ran it 34 times. I can't imagine Tua running less than AJ did (Tua ran the ball 27 time in limited play), but even if he ran the same amount, there's just not 10 more touches for running backs per game in there, it seems to me most of those "extra" touches are going to receivers.
Few things though:
We had one fewer game, so total plays are down quite a bit just because of that and there were more games that were out of contention early so we slowed play down reducing the number of plays even more (total of 111 fewer total plays)
Tua got a lot of the pass reps that Jalen didn't. Total passes last year was 333 - yes still down, but not as much as you're thinking. Total rushing plays was also down in 17 from 16. We did run more as a percentage (61% t0 65%) in 17, but again, much of that was because we had more blowout games where we were trying to kill clock and run it out.
Jalen averaged 11.9 carries per game in the last two years so agree there aren't 10 extra RB reps per game, but I'd bet there are at least 6-8 reps per game that will be split out to RBs and WRs. I wouldn't be surprised to see that somewhat evenly split out due to better ability to make the defense cover the entire field which will open up the running game more, and if we keep RPO as part of the offense the defense will actually believe that every once and a while we'll actually use the "P" part of those plays.
I'd agree with that generally speaking. My argument wasn't that there won't be better distribution, just that there's no way on earth it would be at least ten more rushes per game for the running backs. I'd buy 3-4 more touches for running backs and receivers respectively or something in the ballpark.agree there aren't 10 extra RB reps per game, but I'd bet there are at least 6-8 reps per game that will be split out to RBs and WRs.
The context wasn't meant to analyze Jalen's productivity but just how many run and pass plays there will be in this upcoming season. That aside, I will point out that a lot of college teams lean on those things so they still count. I think Daboll did neither Hurts nor the Alabama offense any favors to remove those from the playbook. What you got instead was just a less effective offense (even when you add in Tua stats to the mix Alabama's offense was still less effective under Daboll and Kiffin pretty much took his last game off).Remember also that a lot of Jalen’s “pass attempts†were jet sweeps, especially in 2016.
The jet sweep is essentially a running play. So if you back those attempts / completions / yards out of his passing totals, his stats look a lot more pedestrian.
And, how much did it help his development to sit and watch all year, as opposed to the baptism by fire that Jalen received?
I totally agree, just saying that a year of learning was probably beneficial.There are two sides to that argument though: a #2 will get reps and prep so the developmental aspects certainly would apply, but, being the #3 guy, he likely didn't get many reps at all other than maybe the scout team, which isn't running our offense, plays and terminology.
I think everyone would agree that he was a better QB than if he'd also been thrown in the fire as a true freshman at the beginning of the year...I totally agree, just saying that a year of learning was probably beneficial.
I'd agree with that generally speaking. My argument wasn't that there won't be better distribution, just that there's no way on earth it would be at least ten more rushes per game for the running backs. I'd buy 3-4 more touches for running backs and receivers respectively or something in the ballpark.
I guess the reason is irritated me a bit is that it fell under the hyperbole that sometimes accompanies the subject. There are enough positives to Tua starting, no need to fabricate false ones like running backs getting ten more carries per game. As was pointed out though, Bo being gone will mean more carries for some of the backs though.
The context wasn't meant to analyze Jalen's productivity but just how many run and pass plays there will be in this upcoming season. That aside, I will point out that a lot of college teams lean on those things so they still count. I think Daboll did neither Hurts nor the Alabama offense any favors to remove those from the playbook. What you got instead was just a less effective offense (even when you add in Tua stats to the mix Alabama's offense was still less effective under Daboll and Kiffin pretty much took his last game off).
And, how much did it help his development to sit and watch all year, as opposed to the baptism by fire that Jalen received?
There are two sides to that argument though: a #2 will get reps and prep so the developmental aspects certainly would apply, but, being the #3 guy, he likely didn't get many reps at all other than maybe the scout team, which isn't running our offense, plays and terminology.
I started getting worked up about this early on last season actually. Obviously, I don't know everything about Hurts, what he did in practice, etc... but I became frustrated with the run heavy, and honestly kind of predictable nature of Daboll's offense. He did what people said he'd do before he arrived, but I didn't see a plan to develop Hurts in how the game was called. I really expected the emphasis to be in developing Hurts.So I can't help but wonder why those reps, with the game in hand, were not better used to improve his play. Instead Alabama tried to run the ball more to seal the victories. Imagine how much more Jalen could have improved if he was forced to throw the ball down the field late in those games.
Jalen Hurts did a fabulous job his freshman year considering his circumstances. But I'm afraid he paid the price for it his sophomore year and it appears it might ultimately cost him his starting job.
Not going to lie though. I'm rooting hard for Paul Tyson to succeed. I don't think there would be anything cooler than him winning a Championship or 2 here as our starting QB. Or even a Heisman.
Do you think with Jalen, Tua, and Jones all with 2-3 years to play that we get both Tyson and Taulia? I realize the pull for both of them, but somebody needs to advise them that their chances of playing early are zero and maybe not at all. While I love Alabama as much as anyone, if I am a top QB prospect I would probably be looking at a program where I could get some playing time even with taking a RS year.
While Jalen had to learn without that advantage, he also played the entire game most of his TF season. So I can't help but wonder why those reps, with the game in hand, were not better used to improve his play. Instead Alabama tried to run the ball more to seal the victories. Imagine how much more Jalen could have improved if he was forced to throw the ball down the field late in those games.
KrAzY3; said:The Hurts chapter continues to be a puzzling one for me, but it's so easy to forget he's still a teenager. It isn't over, but there are two really stark views on him. One is that he's basically just deficient as a passer, could never make it in the NFL, and basically what you see is what you get. The other is that he's someone who has had his development stunted, he was thrust into playing too early, is going on his fourth OC, was never really developed properly. May be we'll get to figure out the answer to that at some point...