the 28 signature rule didnt exist in 28, if it didnt exist now i would have a problem with it. maybe you should drop half of your screen name btw.
and i would never hesitate to use the words icky about south carolina.
Born in Tuscaloosa, lifelong Bama fan. My parents went to Bama, my cousins went to Bama, my uncle played for Bama. 1990 USC graduate, long-suffering Gamecock fan since early 80s (grew up in Columbia). Only missed two Bama-UT games since 1983. Believe it or not I wore a Bama shirt to the game in Columbia this year (my son wore a Gamecock shirt and a Bama hat, though despite my protest he took the hat off at half-time). My user name fits me perfectly.
As for your post, I did not read it that you were only referencing complying with the new 28 signee rule, my bad. Still, the kids who may be left out on signing day were made aware of that when they committed and are aware they will either GS or go to their second option. Even without 28 rule in 2008, Bama signed 32 kids but could only bring in 25. How did the other 7 break down? Were there any who ended up not getting 2008 schollies to Bama? I'm not razzing on Bama, I'm just realistic enough to know that Bama has oversigned/overcommitted in the past and likely will oversign and/or over commit in the future.
I do agree with you that the NCAA and/or SEC should put a hard 28 rule in place where the most a school can sign is 28, period... but that's not the current rule.