Russia Invades Ukraine IX

Status
Not open for further replies.

4Q Basket Case

FB|BB Moderator
Staff member
Nov 8, 2004
10,686
16,321
337
Tuscaloosa
Not a great deal more in the second video but still worth watching. I had the thought, after watching, that, as much as I poo-pooed Putin's rationale for the war, really was a defensive war, if one has a certain paranoid mindset. OTOH, as the speaker says, we speak from the standpoint of having two non-threatening neighbors...
His summary on other hour-long videos is that we have crunchy borders and a gooey interior.

Atlantic Ocean on the East, Pacific Ocean on the West, and at least relatively friendly neighbors on the north and south….both of whom would go down the drain about a nanosecond after we do, if it comes to that. IOW, it’s in Canada’s and Mexico’s existential interest that the USA stays healthy.

Rephrased, if we’re threatened, Canada and Mexico will help us with everything they have….not because they love us, but because if we die, they do too.

Less metaphorically, we have boundaries, especially on the east and west, that would be really tough for a foe to physically penetrate.

Even if they did, we have the combination of mass of area, two conveniently placed mountain ranges (Rockies on the west and Appalachians on the east), and a massively armed population, that would make it far more difficult to hold territory than to take it in the first place….and taking it would be no mean feat.

All that is at least in part because it’s really easy for us to move stuff around internally — rivers, rail, an interstate highway network (which a few of the OFC might remember was initially funded with defense dollars).

In addition to which, there’s a whole bunch of secondary roads that, regardless of how much we complain about potholes, are in incredibly good condition compared to anywhere else in the world, and would be impossible to disable en masse.

Keep in mind that even that dire scenario doesn’t count God’s own number of landing strips in major airports, lesser ones, and hundreds of others like the Shelby County Airport outside of Birmingham. We can put down air cover anywhere in the country, and do it within minutes.

I’m worried about a lot of things, but I’m not worried about America’s physical security against an enemy invading from the outside.

An inside job is another story…….
 
Last edited:

UAH

All-American
Nov 27, 2017
4,196
5,305
187
The US ambassador to Brazil said, "Brazil is a potential superpower. And always will be."
Their legal structure, tax structure, trade restrictions and tradition of corruption practically assures that they will never achieve first world economic status.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TIDE-HSV

4Q Basket Case

FB|BB Moderator
Staff member
Nov 8, 2004
10,686
16,321
337
Tuscaloosa
I found his discussion about Mexico interesting (and a bit surprising) - they could well become a real world power in the future.
Demographically, Mexico is the antithesis of Russia.

Russia’s demographic distribution is diamond-shaped, meaning there are fewer and fewer young people to replace the older ones as they die off. In their case, a cohort of men in the age range of effective military combat is both limited and shrinking.

Mexico’s looks much more like an champagne coupe turned upside down — lots of young people as compared to older ones.

I’m not as sure as Zeihan is that they can become an economic power. Their economy is just so dominated by drugs. Their police, judiciary and government are notoriously corrupt, and enforceability of contracts is spotty at best (that’s the corrupt judiciary playing in).

The older I get, the more I think that last thing — reliable enforceability of contracts — is the single most important non-military aspect to national security.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tidewater

TIDE-HSV

Senior Administrator
Staff member
Oct 13, 1999
86,745
45,159
437
Huntsville, AL,USA
Demographically, Mexico is the antithesis of Russia.

Russia’s demographic distribution is diamond-shaped, meaning there are fewer and fewer young people to replace the older ones as they die off. In their case, a cohort of men in the age range of effective military combat is both limited and shrinking.

Mexico’s looks much more like an champagne coupe turned upside down — lots of young people as compared to older ones.

I’m not as sure as Zeihan is that they can become an economic power. Their economy is just so dominated by drugs. Their police, judiciary and government are notoriously corrupt, and enforceability of contracts is spotty at best (that’s the corrupt judiciary playing in).

The older I get, the more I think that last thing — reliable enforceability of contracts — is the single most important non-military aspect to national security.
That and the reliability of government, from the lowest to the highest level, to deal with you honestly. More than just government - professionals, tradesmen, merchants, etc. I'll give you an example. My daughter lives in France and she has a rare condition, requiring seeing several different specialists. It's been a rocky road, with a couple actually discharging her. They have a friend, native to the area, who is independently wealthy but has worked for them, mostly as a favor. (They only found out about his wealth when he offered to buy the place.) Now, France is a single provider country, supposedly, though the federal insurance does have tiers. They have the top tier, where there's no copay - everything is supposedly covered. Dan, the friend/employee let them know the customs. You are expected to offer a gratuity to the doctor for a favorable, early appointment. He told them that, if they had been French, the doctor would have asked for the bribe right on the front end. He said that, since Dominik is German and Rachel is American, the doctors knew they weren't familiar with having to bribe doctors. But he said it probably had something to do with the doctors releasing them - not making enough money off them. And France is supposedly a first world country...
 

4Q Basket Case

FB|BB Moderator
Staff member
Nov 8, 2004
10,686
16,321
337
Tuscaloosa
That and the reliability of government, from the lowest to the highest level, to deal with you honestly. More than just government - professionals, tradesmen, merchants, etc. I'll give you an example. My daughter lives in France and she has a rare condition, requiring seeing several different specialists. It's been a rocky road, with a couple actually discharging her. They have a friend, native to the area, who is independently wealthy but has worked for them, mostly as a favor. (They only found out about his wealth when he offered to buy the place.) Now, France is a single provider country, supposedly, though the federal insurance does have tiers. They have the top tier, where there's no copay - everything is supposedly covered. Dan, the friend/employee let them know the customs. You are expected to offer a gratuity to the doctor for a favorable, early appointment. He told them that, if they had been French, the doctor would have asked for the bribe right on the front end. He said that, since Dominik is German and Rachel is American, the doctors knew they weren't familiar with having to bribe doctors. But he said it probably had something to do with the doctors releasing them - not making enough money off them. And France is supposedly a first world country...
Those who want the US to move to a single provider healthcare system often cite the French system as the example of how it should be done.

I’m truly sorry for the trouble your daughter has had getting adequate treatment for her medical conditions. Your past accounts of her being essentially fired as a patient, in the midst of life-threatening illness, have been chilling examples that the promise is simply not the reality.

Doctors don’t make the huge salaries that they do in the US. But they make it up in bribes — which I’m guessing aren’t taxed — and the general French population just views it as part of the deal. Don’t make enough money on a given patient? No worries…just cut her off, never mind that she’s fighting potentially deadly conditions.

The flip side of a “free” medical system.
 
Last edited:

NationalTitles18

Suspended
May 25, 2003
32,419
42,281
362
Mountainous Northern California
Those who want the US to move to a single provider healthcare system often cite the French system as the example of how it should be done.

I’m truly sorry for the trouble your daughter has had getting adequate treatment for her medical conditions. Your past accounts of her being essentially fired as a patient, in the midst of life-threatening illness, have been chilling examples that the promise is simply not the reality.

Doctors don’t make the huge salaries that they do in the US. But they make it up in bribes — which I’m guessing aren’t taxed — and the general French population just views it as part of the deal. Don’t make enough money on a given patient? No worries…just cut her off, never mind that she’s fighting potentially deadly conditions.

The flip side of a “free” medical system.
France apparently either does not have the protections the US does or it does not enforce them. Either way, that does not invalidate the entire idea of insurance for all or even single payer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CrimsonRuss

TIDE-HSV

Senior Administrator
Staff member
Oct 13, 1999
86,745
45,159
437
Huntsville, AL,USA
Those who want the US to move to a single provider healthcare system often cite the French system as the example of how it should be done.

I’m truly sorry for the trouble your daughter has had getting adequate treatment for her medical conditions. Your past accounts of her being essentially fired as a patient, in the midst of life-threatening illness, have been chilling examples that the promise is simply not the reality.

Doctors don’t make the huge salaries that they do in the US. But they make it up in bribes — which I’m guessing aren’t taxed — and the general French population just views it as part of the deal. Don’t make enough money on a given patient? No worries…just cut her off, never mind that she’s fighting potentially deadly conditions.

The flip side of a “free” medical system.
I didn't want to get boring, but it permeates society there. No small businessman pays the huge taxes to support both the medical and the expansive social safety net. Instead a huge part of the economy is under the table. They found out they were the only ones paying the government. All the others' employees were "off the books." However, with the pandemic, it came back to bite a lot in the ass. The government's payments for restaurants, etc., having to close for the pandemic, were based on what you'd reported to the government. They did quite well, while other restaurants went under because they received little in the way of subsidy during the lockdown...
 

4Q Basket Case

FB|BB Moderator
Staff member
Nov 8, 2004
10,686
16,321
337
Tuscaloosa
France apparently either does not have the protections the US does or it does not enforce them. Either way, that does not invalidate the entire idea of insurance for all or even single payer.
Oh, I'm all for insurance. I even came around on ObamaCare when it became apparent that the insurance companies and the healthcare providers adjusted and made it profitable for both sides.

The problem is that about the time the insurance companies and healthcare providers got their stuff together, Congress went in and removed the individual mandate, which was the main underpinning for the whole thing. So young people opted out in droves, leaving only the OFC and a way-too-high proportion of high-risk people actually buying the stuff, making it financially unstable.

Which gets around to my point from another direction -- you involve government in the delivery of just about anything, and you'll get inefficiency at best, and corruption at worst, putting the screws to the very people it purports to protect. No, the system we have isn't perfect -- not even close. But it beats the hell out of anybody else's.

Fully acknowledging that I played a big part in the thread drift, it's probably time to get back on the Ukrainian topic heading. If anyone wants to start a thread on healthcare, feel free.
 
Last edited:

NationalTitles18

Suspended
May 25, 2003
32,419
42,281
362
Mountainous Northern California
Oh, I'm all for insurance. I even came around on ObamaCare when it became apparent that the insurance companies and the healthcare providers adjusted and made it profitable for both sides.

The problem is that about the time the insurance companies and healthcare providers got their stuff together, Congress went in and removed the individual mandate, which was the main underpinning for the whole thing. So young people opted out in droves, leaving only the OFC and a way-too-high proportion of high-risk people actually buying the stuff, making it financially unstable.

Which gets around to my point from another direction -- you involve government in the delivery of just about anything, and you'll get inefficiency at best, and corruption at worst, putting the screws to the very people it purports to protect. No, the system we have isn't perfect -- not even close. But it beats the hell out of anybody else's.
Frankly, if one side would stop obstructing and deliberately sabotaging things it would be of help.

I'll add that Medicare has been a resounding success despite its shortcomings. Medicare for all is not a bad idea, if we can keep bad actors from sabotaging it.
 

TIDE-HSV

Senior Administrator
Staff member
Oct 13, 1999
86,745
45,159
437
Huntsville, AL,USA
I've come to the reluctant conclusion that the Ukrainians will lose. IDK know how much - I don't think they'll lose the entire country - but they'll lose. IDK if we could have gotten more weapons, and especially ammo, to them or we hedged our bets too long, but they don't have enough weapons nor ammo, particularly for artillery. The other side of the coin is learning curve. In too many cases, they just don't know yet how to use what they have. It's a sad situation...

Edit: I didn't read the Kasparov tweet before I posted, but I totally agree with him...
 
  • Like
Reactions: crimsonaudio

Tidewater

FB|NS|NSNP Moderator
Staff member
Mar 15, 2003
24,927
19,426
337
Hooterville, Vir.
The good news is that the condemnation is only intended to increase pressure on Kyiv to exchange Medvedchuk. I do not actually expect Donetsk to carry out the execution unless they believe the Donetsk Peoples' Republic is on the edge of losing the war.
 
  • Thank You
Reactions: crimsonaudio

Tidewater

FB|NS|NSNP Moderator
Staff member
Mar 15, 2003
24,927
19,426
337
Hooterville, Vir.
Status
Not open for further replies.
|

Latest threads

TideFans.shop - Get your Gear HERE!

Alabama Crimson Tide Car Door Light
Alabama Crimson Tide Car Door Light

Get this and many more items at our TideFans.shop!

Purchases may result in a commission being paid to TideFans.