My biggest worry remains QB.
Clearly, there is something with Ty where he is still having trouble adjusting to college so he's behind Buchner now.
Buchner I think could be more effective or consistent down to down than Milroe but he likely is also less explosive both from a running standpoint and from a deep ball standpoint. He also does have a history of turning the ball over so even if there is improvement there it might not be enough.
I'm just not sold we have a QB on the roster who can cover the other holes on the team well enough to get us to where we need to be to compete for an SEC or National Championship. Also, playing Texas early in the year gives other teams a blueprint on how to attack us. Not many of them can pull it off the way Texas did but there are a few who might be able to.
My personal opinion on why Jalen started these first two games? I think Saban looked at all three, and felt that there wasn’t a “significant difference” in terms of the ability to win with them. Each may have something different to offer as it relates to skill sets, but if “push comes to shove” he each possesses enough of the things they were good at to win.
So why Milroe? Tenure. He was the “next man up” last year and nothing had been shown by the others for him to say “Sorry Jalen, I have to go with the other guy…” . I think the “won the team” thing may have cemented in CNS’ mind the Jalen was the right choice. Saban does have some faults, and sometimes loyalty in one. (See one Pete Golding)
Just another gut feeling: I believe if truth was know, Buchner would have been Rees choice to start. I go back to his comment about “not being the one picking the QB” in fall as a way of saying “but if I did I know who it would be”.
I think both of these posts kinda sing towards each other in the fact that we really never had a great option. We don’t and never had a Bryce, Mac, Hurts, or Tua on the roster and we missed any opportunity to have a great experienced successor when we started the spring with Milroe vs Simpson instead of bringing a guy in pre spring from the portal. There are guys who could guide us to our goals if things go right. However there was probably an option that was far more high risk and high reward more than the others. That ofcourse is Milroe.
After going to the scrimmages and from going through multiple ironclad sources it’s apparent that there is a huge disagreement between the team and the staff at who should be quarterback. Saban chose the path of least resistance and was hoping for the best. Well now we are here.
The advantages Buchner has over Milroe is processing the field, familiarity, and delivering the ball. However there is a trade off in terms of overall athleticism and still questions of whether his issues at ND were more youth or the product of his game. So there is a risk In playing him but the risk of not playing him at this point is probably greater.
If Milroe continues to hog reps in practice and vs USF then I guarantee you that recruits and other teams will notice and we are going to sweat on having firm commitments from top talent this December.